User talk:Urbanarcheology

Please add new talk sections to the end of the page

"'If your handle is 'The359', please do us all a favor and dont write anything on this page, go sell crazy somewhere else."

Image source problem with Image:Bethsteellogo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bethsteellogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. richi (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

blah blah blah —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.227.131.13 (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:SFBridge016357pv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SFBridge016357pv.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU≈talk 14:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

OK

I don't know why the fuck you're even involved in the conversation, but if you want to continue to follow and attack people over something you know little about, then I suggest being careful in throwing around the word crazy. If you want to keep this up, fine, we'll see how long you're welcome on Wikipedia. The359 (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, accusing someone who moved your picture around (in an attempt to fix your mistake), of having malicious intent. Sounds like you seem to object to anyone else's opinion in regards to a photo on an article. Sounds rather like "ownership" to me... The359 (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

hahahaha! "Dogmatic" = The359; I agree! Hempdiddy (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm flattered that you feel the need to take this much time to check over my edits, attempt to "warn" others that I might just know some of Wikipedia's rules and maybe even know what the hell I'm talking about, and even feel the need to single me out on your very own talk page, so everybody can know just how much effort you put into attempting to insult and "stop" a page-owning crazy dogmatic like me. Such dedication. The359 (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop leaving so many comments, it's as if you're trying to exert ownership of this talk page by sheer amount of comments. Q ^{T C} 23:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

thank you for proving my point 359, you make your insanity more clear ever day.Urbanarcheology (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)