User talk:RainBowAndArrow: Difference between revisions
→External links removal: new section |
Stripedtiger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
While I agree with some of the link removals you have done, there is no policy-based reason to blanket remove all "unofficial" links. --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 18:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
While I agree with some of the link removals you have done, there is no policy-based reason to blanket remove all "unofficial" links. --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 18:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
== MGS4 Reviews == |
|||
Why are you removing some of the MGS4 reviews? This game is an international anticipation and you've removed many credible publications and even though they are not recognized in the US, they are still very credible in the respective countries. --[[User:Stripedtiger|Stripedtiger]] ([[User talk:Stripedtiger|talk]]) 00:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:10, 31 May 2008
Template:Archive box collapsible
Ninja Gaiden (2004 video game) Infobox
Hi Falcon9x5, I have put up two new versions of Infobox for discussion. Please check it out in the talk page and comment. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 07:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Rating Pending is a rating
Just for what it's worth see ESRB article with a Rating Pending sticker on it. Although I don't really know if its appropriate to rate that a game is rated RP just for rating's sake. Strongsauce (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Your comment on the GTA IV plot hoax
- "source please!"
Were you being serious?! :D Emil Kastberg (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, right, it's just I couldn't avoid reading it and I saw pretty quickly that it was a complete joke! You should actually go and read it, really. :D Emil Kastberg (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
GTA IV MC Review Score
Actually it was 99 when I added it with 11 reviews. Good thing you updated that :-) --SoWhy Talk 18:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
gta iv=
its not my view, i put the links to the reviews and boards where i read realli bad reviews, its very important that ppl no what other gamers thiink, so please dont removed it again since it is sourced info. USEDfan (talk) 17:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
God not there-article, critic
Hi! In regards to your latest edit on the God not there-article: Do you think it'd be better to write "New Testament historian" or "New Testament historian and critic of the movie"? As I had understood it, this historian had formatted a wholely negative response to the film, which, if you agree with me, would justify add that he is a "critic of the movie". Scaller (talk) 21:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
/* Resolution Criticisms */
Could I get a valid reason for deleting this alt please? 78.16.21.48 (talk)
External links removal
While I agree with some of the link removals you have done, there is no policy-based reason to blanket remove all "unofficial" links. --- RockMFR 18:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
MGS4 Reviews
Why are you removing some of the MGS4 reviews? This game is an international anticipation and you've removed many credible publications and even though they are not recognized in the US, they are still very credible in the respective countries. --Stripedtiger (talk) 00:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)