Jump to content

User talk:Chiboyers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Chiboyers (talk | contribs)
talking
Chiboyers (talk | contribs)
talking
Line 5: Line 5:
:For the record, I unblocked you because the evidence was too thin. I did not unblock you because I thought that the Barbaro info you are trying to add was free from hoax content. I strongly advise you not to try to add that info again. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] ([[User talk:Daniel J. Leivick|talk]]) 18:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
:For the record, I unblocked you because the evidence was too thin. I did not unblock you because I thought that the Barbaro info you are trying to add was free from hoax content. I strongly advise you not to try to add that info again. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel J. Leivick]] ([[User talk:Daniel J. Leivick|talk]]) 18:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


I understand, I will leave it up to you/wiki admins.to make the appropriate reverting.
I understand, I will leave it up to you/wiki admins. to make the appropriate reverting.[[User:Chiboyers|Chiboyers]] ([[User talk:Chiboyers#top|talk]]) 19:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:04, 6 June 2008

Barbaros

I recommend that you just stay away from all articles having to do with the Barbaro family. Other editors are working on checking the sources of the removed information, and whatever turns out to be accurate will be readded. If you persist in reverting these articles, you will almost certainly be blocked again. Deor (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, and I have also received a block again from Starblind- please also lift that. I will leave it up to you to revert, but for the record, I have seen the case file that Daniel presented to me- The problematic areas pertain to The Pugilist Club and the Sacred Order of Skull and Cresent- I have never heard of any such groups, those should NEVER be attributd to this Barbaro family. Also, I know that there is some concern about user McTrain as Daniel expressed- I don't really know how this user fits into the hoax because what is he has contributed is accurate info and legitimately sourced- so there is some mix up somewhere, and when I looked at his contribution record- there is no indicator of any pugilist club or sacred order writings-so defintely there is some confussion with Wiki administrators as well. Basing just on the Barbaro family articles and sourcing- there is nothing wrong for sure with that info.Chiboyers (talk) 18:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I unblocked you because the evidence was too thin. I did not unblock you because I thought that the Barbaro info you are trying to add was free from hoax content. I strongly advise you not to try to add that info again. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 18:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I will leave it up to you/wiki admins. to make the appropriate reverting.Chiboyers (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]