User talk:Jons63: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 78.176.233.103 - "→Byzantium: " |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Why do I have to discuss content that is an obvious and outrageous lie? Who censors the censors, you guys are becoming the tyranny of wikipedia, because you do not want truthful and factual information - only a consensus of lies. What you have posted is not only racist, it hinges on a direct attack against historical facts to belittle a group of people. Wake up. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.176.233.103|78.176.233.103]] ([[User talk:78.176.233.103|talk]]) 05:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Why do I have to discuss content that is an obvious and outrageous lie? Who censors the censors, you guys are becoming the tyranny of wikipedia, because you do not want truthful and factual information - only a consensus of lies. What you have posted is not only racist, it hinges on a direct attack against historical facts to belittle a group of people. Wake up. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.176.233.103|78.176.233.103]] ([[User talk:78.176.233.103|talk]]) 05:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Also, take a moment and actually look at the link I provided. This is the correct Byzantium flag as it is presented on Wikipedia. Do some cross checking and realize that what is on the Byzantium page is a Muslim attack against the Byzantium Christian Church. At no time in the history of Christianity was a Crescent Moon used. This is an outrageous lie. |
|||
Revision as of 05:28, 21 June 2008
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | Jons63 is taking a semi-wikibreak and will fully return to Wikipedia later. |
Top Importance Chicago Articles
If you want to help me choose Category:Top-importance Chicago articles, come comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates by June 5th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Byzantium
I want an explanation of why you keep reverting material that is an obvious fake? The crescent moon was never a symbol of Byzantium and Constantine never added the Virgin Mary as a star. How can you expect anyone to take this site seriously when you print such lies! When are you going to embrace the truth and delete this false entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.176.233.103 (talk) 15:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I only reverted it once and the explanation as to why I reverted it was on the edit summary of my reversion. Here it is again, you removed content and did not explain why you removed it. Looking through your edits on the article, after I reverted your change you then went and started adding commentary when you were removing comment. Please discuss the changes on the talk page and explain why you believe that content doesn't belong. Jons63 (talk) 05:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Why do I have to discuss content that is an obvious and outrageous lie? Who censors the censors, you guys are becoming the tyranny of wikipedia, because you do not want truthful and factual information - only a consensus of lies. What you have posted is not only racist, it hinges on a direct attack against historical facts to belittle a group of people. Wake up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.176.233.103 (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Also, take a moment and actually look at the link I provided. This is the correct Byzantium flag as it is presented on Wikipedia. Do some cross checking and realize that what is on the Byzantium page is a Muslim attack against the Byzantium Christian Church. At no time in the history of Christianity was a Crescent Moon used. This is an outrageous lie.