User talk:68.111.172.226

In addition to being a sock, the user violated WP:3RR. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

As did your little friend, ArthurRubin. 68.111.172.226 (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

3RR doesn't count when reverting vandalism, such as yours. Check the policy... —  X  S  G  02:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I think his edits were unsourced, but not vandalism. The exemption that Arthur mentioned was block evasion. PhilKnight (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd consider the re-introduction of information that has been repeatedly struck from the article for lack of a source as "Sneaky Vandalism". This user has also performed sneaky vandalism by removing the {{fact}} tags from these same entries without providing a source. If you look at the individual edits, they do, indeed, look like a simple addition of unsourced information. If you instead look at the pattern of behavior over time, the vandalism becomes crystal clear. —  X  S  G  07:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

People are accusing me of evading a block, and have given no proof!!!! What is this? 68.111.172.226 (talk) 05:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Your edits are strikingly similar to a previously-blocked individual (compare this edit performed by 68.111.172.226 to this edit performed by 75.43.198.86 and then this edit performed by 75.43.208.142 to this edit performed by User:Ericsaindon2). We weren't born yesterday, and we're not falling for it, just like we haven't fallen for it the last eight times you've tried to pull this nonsense. You can change your IP address all you like; the POV of your edits will always give you away, Eric. —  X  S  G  07:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

What are you people talking about? I dont even live in Anaheim Hills, I live in Escondido.68.111.172.226 (talk) 09:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Then how can you explain the fact that your edits are identical to the ones performed by 75.43.198.86, an IP address that is identified with the Los Angeles area? So your parents live in Escondido and you're home for summer vacation... —  X  S  G  08:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I LIVE IN ESCONDIDO!!!! Nobody lives in Los Angeles. I told you, I REVERTED an edit done by whomever that other person was because the edit was unjustly reverted, and was better than the existing edits. You act like I typed the exact same thing. People revert edits all the time, its not like I did this magical thing. You do it frequently, except when you dont like an edit, you accuse the person of being someone else. I dont live in Los Angeles, I am an adult and I dont need to be talked to like a child for simply reverting an unjustified deletion BY YOU.68.111.172.226 (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

68.111.172.226 (talk) 08:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.111.172.226 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, then I will take the punishment for 3rr, but I will NOT take the punishment for being a sockpuppet because I am not one. What I did was clearly not vandalism, and ArthurRubin is clearly trying to find his way out of something he did as well. He has no source that it was vandalism, he just didn't like the content or the editor. Please, reduce my block from an unconfirmed sock to 3rr.

Decline reason:

you have obviously edited before. If you want us to even consider an unblock you need to tell us the name of the account — Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

68.111.172.226 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I dont have an account, I never have. Look, I have edited the Escondido, California page in the past. You can probably see my edits there, and yes, I did have a different IP number then, but it is in the same series (begins with 68). I have edited others, but can't recall them off the top of my head. Check the Escondido page, you could probably see them there. I am not a sock, can't you give me the benefit of the doubt. I came to the Anaheim Hills page, and saw the intro that was reverted, and liked the one that was reverted better than the one that was there. The other one (that is there now) sounded bad, so I reverted it back to the better sounding one.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I dont have an account, I never have. Look, I have edited the Escondido, California page in the past. You can probably see my edits there, and yes, I did have a different IP number then, but it is in the same series (begins with 68). I have edited others, but can't recall them off the top of my head. Check the Escondido page, you could probably see them there. I am not a sock, can't you give me the benefit of the doubt. I came to the Anaheim Hills page, and saw the intro that was reverted, and liked the one that was reverted better than the one that was there. The other one (that is there now) sounded bad, so I reverted it back to the better sounding one. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I dont have an account, I never have. Look, I have edited the Escondido, California page in the past. You can probably see my edits there, and yes, I did have a different IP number then, but it is in the same series (begins with 68). I have edited others, but can't recall them off the top of my head. Check the Escondido page, you could probably see them there. I am not a sock, can't you give me the benefit of the doubt. I came to the Anaheim Hills page, and saw the intro that was reverted, and liked the one that was reverted better than the one that was there. The other one (that is there now) sounded bad, so I reverted it back to the better sounding one. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I dont have an account, I never have. Look, I have edited the Escondido, California page in the past. You can probably see my edits there, and yes, I did have a different IP number then, but it is in the same series (begins with 68). I have edited others, but can't recall them off the top of my head. Check the Escondido page, you could probably see them there. I am not a sock, can't you give me the benefit of the doubt. I came to the Anaheim Hills page, and saw the intro that was reverted, and liked the one that was reverted better than the one that was there. The other one (that is there now) sounded bad, so I reverted it back to the better sounding one. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}