Jump to content

User talk:122.104.137.25: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
decline unblock
Line 13: Line 13:
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
{{unblock reviewed|1=I made factual edits on wikipedia|decline=Your edits were disruptive. In future, I suggest you establish consensus on the talk page, before making controversial changes. — [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 13:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=I made factual edits on wikipedia|decline=Your edits were disruptive. In future, I suggest you establish consensus on the talk page, before making controversial changes. — [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 13:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|I started a discussion, but no one responded; therefore unable to reach a consensus}}

Revision as of 13:53, 28 June 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, to Dan Brown it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.Modernist (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues on Dan Brown, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Modernist (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Evolution as theory and fact. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Gail (talk) 12:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Evolution as theory and fact. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 12:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for inserting false or misleading information into articles.. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

122.104.137.25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I made factual edits on wikipedia

Decline reason:

Your edits were disruptive. In future, I suggest you establish consensus on the talk page, before making controversial changes. — PhilKnight (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

122.104.137.25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I started a discussion, but no one responded; therefore unable to reach a consensus

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I started a discussion, but no one responded; therefore unable to reach a consensus |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I started a discussion, but no one responded; therefore unable to reach a consensus |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I started a discussion, but no one responded; therefore unable to reach a consensus |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}