Talk:North Macedonia/name

Important notice: This page is solely for constructive discussion of how best to deal with the naming of the Republic of Macedonia, within Wikipedia talkpage guidelines. If you have come here to solely to protest against the current naming, please don't post here. Such objections have been raised before, and been given our consideration. A summary of the current consensus regarding the naming of entities called "Macedonia" or "Macedonian" can be found at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Macedonia-related articles). Suggestions are expected to be informed by Wikipedia policies and guidelines, in particular Wikipedia:Naming conflict and Wikipedia:Naming conventions. Suggestions for an adaptation of standing guidelines are offtopic on this page and belong on Wikipedia talk:Naming conflict or Wikipedia:Village pump (policy).

---

falsification of History

Although I´m not Greek I insist on keeping the official name - FYROM. Wikipedia shouldn´t support any falsification of history! Keep the official international name - Republic of Macedonia is acknowledgen by Turkey only! Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filip36 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This article about the "republic of Macedonia" contains misleading information and inappropriate content. Under UN agreement in no way should any document state the F.Y.R.O.M. under the name of Macedonia of Republic of Macedonia. This article should be put under the F.Y.R.O.M. one and should be protected. I am inclined to believe that Wikipedia will act accordingly to best of everybody's interest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deafakos (talk • contribs) 11:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not answer to the UN, nor any other body. We make distinctions for article based on our own evaluations, it appears that the common English name Republic of Macedonia, or just simply Macedonia. This is also what the country calls it self. This article is not the first, nor the last name dispute, but in this case, if you look t the pages archives you will find that you are only one of hundreds of people who complained, we've been over this before. If we changed the name to FYROM, the people in Skopje would be just as offended as the Greeks. The horse is dead, stop flogging it. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 04:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

SO you believe it is better to abuse it than change it to something mutually accepted... This is a pretty "undemocratic" way of thinking... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.190.34 (talk) 11:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I doubt Samuell is an official Wikipedia admin... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.103.139.110 (talk) 18:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The fact is, the name FYROM is not mutually accepted, otherwise the country would call itself that. Wikipedia is not a democracy we work by consensus and discussion, not voting. And being an admin just gives you a few technical features such as deleting and protecting pages, it doesn't make you a spokesperson or give you much authority. The policies that support what I said before can be found here and here.Samuell Lift me up or put me down 20:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You are contadicting youself here. How can you reach a consensus without democratic processes and no voting? There is no consensus without measuring the "consensus". If someone reports something ABUSIVE about you and this person claimed that it was true then what would you do? Naming FYROM as Republic of Macedonia is abusive to Greeks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deafakos (talk • contribs) 01:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

And naming Macedonia FYROM is abusive to Macedonians.Silvery Swirls (talk) 15:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Fyrom is not on macedon soil its in Dardani and Paeonian soil.Megistias (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Why doesn't FYROM call itself Vardarska or Paeonia? Would it offend them? Is it more fair to take a nation's history (I'm referring to Greece) and call it your own? What kind of justice is this?79.130.177.215 (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

For what its worth, I've heard far more objections from "pow wow" type Indians than "red dot" type Indians about the use of the word "Indian", and it seems kind of silly to me that the Greeks are objecting to some other country's choice of name, as if they had some sort of a trademark on it or something. Its as absurd as if someone named Joe declared that there would no longer be allowed to be any other people named Joe. A country decides its own name. This is pretty simple stuff, and the Greek objections to what another nation calls itself are stupid and immature. Zaphraud (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Move to F.Y.R.O.M

As soon as the latest NATO decision has been postponed, the name should be changed to FYROM. Anything else violates the temporary decision in 1992 about this country's name. Now if you want just to obey to what the USA says, you may keep it as 'Macedonia'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WindowsNT (talk • contribs) 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Can someone please move this whole page and all of its detial into Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia because that is exactly what it is. That is how the UN recognizes it and besides, Macedonia as a place is much bigger in Greece to where it culturally belongs. We can't go ignoring UN policy and more countries recognize FYROM including all of the improtant lands: Western and Central Europe etc. One more thing, Alexander the Great was not FYROM-Macedonian because he lived years before the Slavs came along. Antun Gustav (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not answer to the UN or any other organization or country. The country calls itself Republic of Macedonia so that is the more common English name (and probably the most neutral). The horse is dead, stop flogging it. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 22:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Obviously it should be referred as FYROM simply as that's how UN recognizes -and they themselves accept it that way- and UN is the ultimate place for any de-jure recognition of any state (along with name etc).I mean that's start up things for anyone involved in politics and international law.Otherwise we could name ourselves Republic of Apache and claim billions of dollars for Apache genocide by settlers.Or the Hustler's Republic and hustle anyone within our territory.I mean there is a law you know and UN are the ultimate judge on this law. BTW how ROM is the most "neutral" name.Hhaha lol Eagle of Pontus (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Ahahahahahahahahhaahahhahahaha. BalkanFever 02:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

And I lough upon you, troll. Stop insulting us. 87.221.4.107 (talk) 23:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Going with that line of reasoning, there should not be an article named Taiwan at all since Taiwan is not recognized by the UN. As Samuell said it, stop trying to beat a dead horse. I think this issue has been discussed over and over with everyone trying to push their favorite POV.--Ubardak (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Exactly. The archives of this article, the archives of Macedonia naming dispute, the archives of Macedonian language and the archives of Macedonians (ethnic group), among others, all mention this. BalkanFever 02:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

It is obvious that the name of this article is another proof of the many cases where Greeks can get away with murder in Wikipedia...--   Avg    02:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Fute can be so very entertaining when he wants to, can't he? ·ΚέκρωΨ· (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

It should not be called FYROM because the UN recognizes it as that. It should also not be called RoMacedonia because YES THERE ARE SOME RESERVED WORDS FOR COUNTRY NAMES. It should be called RoMacedonia (formerly FYROM), pendig naming issue. 79.103.155.16 (talk) 22:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Government of Republic of Macedonia never signs any documents with a name different than the constitutional. For example see this [1] and "I consider this Exchange of Letters as the equivalent of signature." wording. --Kirev (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

A pity that its constitutional name is a big lie that will never exist, as Macedonia is Greek my friend. Vardarska is how they should sign. Good game. 87.221.4.107 (talk) 23:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

• I think Ubardak you must reevaluate your knowledge.FYROM accepted entrance and is accepted as such in UN.RO Taiwan didn't.Don't you see a Pacific ocean of difference;;;;For Christ shake. Eagle of Pontus

Maybe you should reevaluate your knowledge. The Republic of Macedonia did not change its name, it just allowed the UN to use a provisional reference. You don't actually care though, you're just "offended" by the "misuse" of the name Macedonia, and in regards to what you think, no-one cares. BalkanFever 09:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

And I think that maybe it is you who should reevaluate his knowledge, huh? Republic of Macedonia is an illegal name that claims upon Greek history and upon Greek territory. It is about you Skopjans, that no one cares. We had enough of your propaganda. You know what we say is true, it is in every history book, but you insist on usurping recklessly our identity. We really really had enough Yugoslavians. STOP your anti-Greek POV and your propaganda. The world has had enough of your lies. 87.221.4.107 (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

• To User BalkanFever and all BalkanFevers: Yes we do care. If Skopje would like to be called Macedonia, this is fine. We,Greeks have no problem as soon as it pays taxes.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magicheader (talk • contribs) 06:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe you should have asked :). BalkanFever 07:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Your country is all bought by the National Bank of Greece. All what you have about industry is Greek. All the food you eat is coming from Greece. You dare bite the hand of who feeds you? You obviously have neither morale nor dignity. The lies of Skopje have been so many and so long that they contradict themselves... 87.221.4.107 (talk) 23:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Please kickbankill BalkanFever for trolling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.97.51.67 (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Until the naming dispute is solved FYROM is the generaly accepted name. Only the US recognised Scopje with its constitutional name. Because of that they should be ignored (the US) by the general public. Their opinion (because is only an opinion) shouldn't be taken into account seriously... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stamatisg (talk • contribs) 22:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Please, rename to the United Nations form at once. 213.97.51.67 (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

"Republic of Macedonia" is total anti-Greek POV and fully Skopjan nationalist POV. Please, rename the article to FYROM as stated by the United Nations and stop trolling and vandalizing the page with your nationalist POV. 87.219.84.68 (talk) 00:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I totally agree, if Wikipedia and the administrators believe they are objective then I strongly recommend that they don't allow propaganda and nationalism in this site79.130.177.215 (talk) 12:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I completely agree as well. Move to FYROM already. Stop telling lies to people! Macedonia is Greek. Yugoslavia is no more. Wake up! Our national bank of Greece has bought all your land, so "all your base are belong to us"... So owned! 87.221.4.107 (talk) 23:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The above users are becoming a bit tiresome with their repetitive racist attacks. In their view, everybody who doesn't share their opinion should be banned and it should be a crime to call Macedonia Macedonia. I suggest some administrator look into the behaviour of some of these users, as they are repeatedly attacking other users alongside their racist attacks directed towards Macedonia.JdeJ (talk) 23:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The above user, JdeJ has clearly shown his biased, anti-Greek opinion and has used psycho logic attacks like warnings on the user pages and attempts

of censorship and has used censorship on Greek users. He is becoming annoying with his obstinacy and his will to harm Greeks. I suggest some administrator look into the behavior of this user together with all others that have posted anti-Greek comments, as they are repeatedly attacking Greek users alongside their propaganda, lies and insults such as the above, calling them racists. It is a real proof that Macedonia is Greek and that FYROMians are trying to usurp Greek history and territory, and he is the kind of person that supports such terrorist acts. 87.221.4.107 (talk) 00:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

As a matter of fact, I try to uphold the Wikipedia policies of WP:MOSMAC and [WP:NPOV]]. While that include edits that the now-blocked user above dislike, they also include opposite edits [2], [3]. And I strongly object to calling "Greeks" racist, I never generalise about any nationality. I've only called the user above racist, and his edit history proves me right. JdeJ (talk) 08:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I have to disagree with you JdeJ. It is historical fact that Skopjans helped the Nazis and Greeks fought against them. Minorities on each sides always existed doing the opposite, but that was not the official move by each government. On the other hand, you have to understand how delicate it is for Greeks to have their history and territory taken over by the Salvs-Skopjans and that it is pretty logical that if 'Republic of Macedonia' is being used, it is first in favor of one group, and second a defiance on the United Nations naming convention. On the other hand, I see that no one of your so called racist-Greeks and POV posters has ever claimed the article to be renamed to 'Republic of Skopje', which is how all Greeks call the country and urge everyone to call it. Instead of that, all the Greeks that have talked here, have asked to take the neutral approach 'FYROM', which could keep both sides partially content. In other words, Skopjans want 'Republic of Macedonia' which is unbalanced. Greeks would prefer 'Republic of Skopje', but are tolerant and willingful to a peaceful end and would allow the use of 'FYROM', even though they still do not like it. In conclussion, using FYROM would be the best choice to keep this article neutral and stop this bitter and endless fight. Otherwise, I am pretty sure more Greeks shall follow claiming that Wikipedia is biased, unobjective and illegal, as it is proving through these moments, where the administrators are favoring one side and defying the United Nations. 87.219.85.149 (talk) 20:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

There's no country named Macedonia, and if you dont know this you can jump to United Nations site and check it out. There are so many other issues, but i think its stupid to even mention them. Of course Alexander the Great was Greek. He spoke Greek. Why these half Albanians-half Slavs dont speak Greek (if they are Macedonians?). ¶ So, its wise for all Greek people to take legal action against wikipedia, cause our History is the most important thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikitas72 (talk • contribs)

No court in the world would take a lawsuit, we are not required to call the country FYROM. And please don't insult anyone, regardless of what ethnicity they are, if they want their own country, they can have it, and they can call it what they like. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 21:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead. Let's everyone send a CEASE AND DESIST letter to wikipedia! Enough is enough! 213.97.51.67 (talk) 13:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Why lowercase 'former'?

Why should 'former' be spelled without capitals? I'm just curious. diego_pmc (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

See Macedonia naming dispute#Compromise solutions and look for the bullet points about two thirds of the way through that section - they explain why. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Nationalism in Wikipedia

Thank you for letting me speak here. I have posted again and it appears that somebody deleted my post but nonetheless, I believe it's the right of everyone to post their ideas. I think that we all are hiding behind our bare fingers, trying to persuade the world that Vardarska is in fact the nation of Macedonia. This nation is the making of Tito and the independence of Vardarska in the early 1990s. What I see that makes me utterly disappointed is the very fact that nationalists and fanatics have the control of this article and don't allow different opinions to be heard. By all means I could call my house the independent, ethnic state of London, New York, Alsace or Rome.

According to the same logic, I can say that it was my fathers that forged the British Empire, my fathers that made the USA or claim that I'm an ethnic Alsacian (We all know that this territory contains german and french populace) or even claim that the Roman Empire was my ethnic territory and claim it through propaganda.

Tell me: Would this appeal to any of you? Would this get this encyclopedia any further? Would extreme nationalism and propaganda benefit any of us? Since I started visiting this site I believed that it was objective and that it was in fact a site that checks all information, and by that I mean historical sources and not proclaimations of people. Why would the Skopians feel offended if they were to be called with their true name? Slavomacedonians or Vardar Macedonians would sound offensive? But wouldn't it be more offensive for the regions of Macedonia in Bulgaria and Greece to have an actual state being called with their name? I haven't seen such problems rise between Bulgaria and Greece since the Balkan Wars and WW2.

To conclude, I speak as an objective person that sees Greece and Bulgaria more offended than the Skopians themselves. What I see is a direct violation of history, political protocols and above all, national heritage. If the Skopians direly want to be called with the name "Macedonia" the only thing they need to consider is paying taxes to Greece.

I believe that as many of you claim that this site is objective you will allow this post to be read by visitors. Truly yours79.130.177.215 (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Objective person?? Don't make us laugh! --Áñtò | Ãňţõ (talk) 18:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

The Economist mentions this bitter name dispute on their magazine

About the Macedonia name conflict, The Economist wrote:

"If the Olympic games featured an event that measured stubborness and prejudice, the partisans from the Wikipedia talk page dealing with the name wrangle could form a world-class joint team."

Link to the article: http://www.economist.com/daily/columns/europeview/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10879850

Very funny! LOL Good job people, you are an Olympic team!!!!⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 19:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Yay! BalkanFever 23:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

A shame on us... The worse thing is that the trolling and fighting from both sides continued in the comments of the article of the economist. Can both sides relax a little? I'm pretty sure we'll have a final solution on the name issue very soon. 87.219.85.149 (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Adding that FYROM does not claim Greek history and territory

I think that in order to calm down things a little bit, it would be wise to add to the article the declarations of the Skopjan President and his ministers, stating that:

1) They do not want to claim any ancient Greek history related to the ancient Macedonia and Alexander the Great.

2) They do not have any territorial claims on Greece and that their constitution clearly forbids it.

3) That they know they are slavs that have nothing to do with the ancient Macedonia and have made clear that everything that was attacking Greek history or territory was spread by propagandistic irredentists who have no official nor legal power to do so.

NOTE: I'm trying to be productive here. If you find any other text that could be added so that fellow Greek users will calm down, go ahead. Goodwill is always welcome.
87.219.85.149 (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I am not going to discuss for the history of macedonia since there is nothing to argue about,everyone that have study even a litle about history know the truth.I am going to give a simple example about what will happen if greeks dont do anything about the name issue and just leave fyrom to be call as they want. Yesterday i was talking with a friend of mine from Moldavia and he ask me why Greece make all that noise with the name issue of Macedonia. I show him the map of greece and told him that Macedonia is the north part of Greece e.t.c ..... and he answers back to me i can understand now why you have that position and then he told me that both romania and ukraine have some regions of them and they call there regions moldavia and they were before moldavias teritories.I dont know what is true about moldavia but i know if now will let them have their country name as our region Macedonia after some years these people going to say the exacly same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.55.194 (talk) 11:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't come here to fight. Of course not. But, if you take into account the fact that Greece and Skopje are now into a "political war", then I believe that you'll be able to understand that the name problem hasn't been resolved yet. This means that you should use the OFFICIAL NAME of the country, which is Skopje, when you are going to refer it to your article. Naming it "Republic of Macedonia" means that the only thing you're managing to succeed is trying to persuade the majority of internet users worldwide (because they are the majority of the people, too and they have a lot "hidden power" into their mind) to use that such a name of that country. So, I advise you to change it to Skopje or AT LEAST at F.Y.R.O.M. in order not to get into trouble with the Greek Politicians and many other people all over the world that know the truth about that topic. That's all from me!

I hope you'll take my opinion into account... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vangelis-Ts (talk • contribs) 15:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

What Greek politicians think ?? booo booo booo

Very important . We are so scared how some bunch of politicians thinks about this issue.

We all do respect culture of ancient Greek culture. But that does not give monopole to modern Greece for "truth" in this case.

Macedonians have right to calle their country as they want to .!! Those Greek insistings of renaming of the country is indescend and nonsence. We two countries named Kongo , two countries named Korea ...

There is only one Macedonia and that is one whose capital is Skopje. That is the OFFICIAL NAME of the country and only accurate one. The province of Greece with the same name is for Greek usage only . --Anto (talk) 13:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop your irredentist propaganda. Why do you steal Greek history and territory? 50 years ago you called your country Vardarska Badovina. What happened to that now? Why do you so ruthlessly try to take what is not yours in any way? Accorting to one of the resolutions of the United Nations related to the right of culture, you have violated it overwhelmingly. Why don't you stop already with your propaganda? Why are you spreading your lies to wikipedia? Stop at once, please. --87.221.5.240 (talk) 21:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia was not influenced by anyone. we chose what is the common English name. If you are still dissatisfied I suggest you go the the [Greek Wikipedia's article] on The Republic of Macedonia, which uses Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, because it is the common Greek name. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 22:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

If you are not Greek, you cannot be Macedonian. It's plain simple. Macedonians were Hellenes, you are Slavs. You changed your name from Vardarska Badovina to Macedonia in 1950 with your beloved Tito. What are you trying to pull now?

--87.221.5.107 (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

You, Hellens, should stop torturing Macedonians and leave them . This is not period of Sokrates and your opinion is not in charge. --Anto (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Please Anto, refrain from pushing propaganda into wikipedia. Distorting history will only cause more wrath and anger. This article is still lacking a detailed explanation about how Tito changed the name of this territory known as Vardarska Badovina in the 1950's. Please, if you really respect the neutral point of view of wikipedia, add that already to the article. The world deserves to know it. --87.221.5.107 (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• • If you think that name "Macedonia" is Greek feud you are very very wrong. The rest of the world does recognize that name. There are two countries named Kongo, two countries named Korea...

This is not ancient Europe but modern Europe in which majority know  for only one Macedonia-
Republic of Macedonia. If Macedonians decide to change their name it will be by their own decision - not somebody's else

Vardarska Banovina did not include just the territory of Republic of Macedonia-it include also contemporary Kosovo and southern Serbia . And Macedonians did call theselves with that name much before Tito came to power-which proves that you are not really informed abou the history of Yugoslavia--Anto (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually... there is a precedent for forcing a state to change its name. After the fall of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and from 1918 it was known as the Republic of German-Austria (Republik Deutsch-Österreich), but the state was forced to change its name to "Republic of Austria" in 1919 peace Treaty of Saint-Germain! It is now still known as Austria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.161.231.107 (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The final criterion

What is more important for wikipedia? How the country calls itself or under which name it is recognized by official international bodies?

Since wikipedia is an international encyclopedia it should adopt the name recognized by official international bodies. That name is FYROM.77.49.116.95 (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

If you look at Talk:Republic_of_Macedonia#Incorrect_again you will see that FYROM is just a provisional name that the UN uses internally until the name dispute is resolved --Enric Naval (talk) 07:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

So provisionally it should be called FYROM. When their name changes, we'll change it here. --87.221.5.161 (talk) 14:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

No, their official name is Republic of Macedonia, FYROM is an provisional name used internally by the UN. Also, see the list of countries using one or other name --Enric Naval (talk) 04:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

So correct those countries too. You cannot be insulting a country just for your own sake. --87.221.4.129 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

No, the legal name is FYROM. Why has wikipedia to go against United Nations conventions? Examples like Myanmar are invalid here. Calling the country Macedonia has irredentism and Wikipedia definitely should not take part of it. Using FYROM is the right way to go until a final name is decided. If you call it Macedonia, you balance it to one side and there you break the NPOV. If you call it Skopje, you balance it to the other side and again you break NPOV. The only way to keep NPOV here is to have both countries content with FYROM. --87.219.84.198 (talk) 00:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Like I clearly say above, FYROM is a name used internally by the UN, stop ignoring that. The country calls itself officially "Republic of Macedonia" --Enric Naval (talk) 02:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Like clearly stated above you are completely ignoring international legality and pledging wikipedia in unnecessary legal doubt. Use the UN name temporarily until the country gets a proper name. This name has to be used wherever Greeks are in order to offend them *less*. The simple fact that Macedonia is in the name of the country is a horrible offense to Greeks. The fact that they are magnanimous and allow their use as FYROM does not mean you have to give it as something defacto. Again please, rename to the legally accepted name and not whatever they want to call themselves, specially in a situation where their name is an insult to another nation. I want to remind you that wikipedia is hosted inside a country under the UN legislation and, as such, has to respect it. We have to stop their propaganda, and this is the beginning. Do you understand now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I advise you to re-read UN conection. The name is for external use, and must compulsorily be respected when there are Greeks around. Please, remember that Greeks refuse completely the use of the word Macedonia in any country where there is no Greek majority. FYROM is a name used to keep the Neutrality in the United Nations and in wikipedia we have to respect NPOV. If the wisest men on earth that lead the UN have chosen UN as a valid external name to reference the country, who are we to fight them? Show up some respect for international law please. --87.221.4.229 (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)