Jump to content

Talk:Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
spelling
Line 7: Line 7:


-REPLY: I don't recall him saying that. He said we're still on our home planet or something more along those lines. In season 3, it is quite clear that Earth is a different planet (Belly of the Beast) and Shuggazoom is refered to as a planet several times. --[[Special:Contributions/76.115.114.12|76.115.114.12]] ([[User talk:76.115.114.12|talk]]) 06:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
-REPLY: I don't recall him saying that. He said we're still on our home planet or something more along those lines. In season 3, it is quite clear that Earth is a different planet (Belly of the Beast) and Shuggazoom is refered to as a planet several times. --[[Special:Contributions/76.115.114.12|76.115.114.12]] ([[User talk:76.115.114.12|talk]]) 06:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

And is it spelled Shugazoom or Shuggazoom? The article uses the two interchangeably. [[Special:Contributions/86.131.102.228|86.131.102.228]] ([[User talk:86.131.102.228|talk]]) 09:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


== Ever consider shortening the title? ==
== Ever consider shortening the title? ==

Revision as of 09:44, 13 July 2008

This page needs to be expanded to conform to Wikipedia article quality. Can anyone expand it?

Shugazoom a planet?

I don't think so, In episode 5, pit of doom gibson says "we're still on earth!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by WakkyDude (talkcontribs) 11:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-REPLY: I don't recall him saying that. He said we're still on our home planet or something more along those lines. In season 3, it is quite clear that Earth is a different planet (Belly of the Beast) and Shuggazoom is refered to as a planet several times. --76.115.114.12 (talk) 06:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And is it spelled Shugazoom or Shuggazoom? The article uses the two interchangeably. 86.131.102.228 (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ever consider shortening the title?

SRMTHFG Even that's pretty long, I guess...

-REPLY: No, because that's the full title of the series, and that's the one people will probably look up on Wikipedia. If you're refering to changing the actual title of the show, this isn't the place. (Netbug009 at 19:19 3 June 2007)

Page Merger

The page has been merged with the other page Super Robot Monkey Team Hyper Force Go! - User:Yllianos

About the characters..

Well, someone started a page for Antauri and I've found very interessant her/his act..

What do you think about the idea of starting a new page for every character? With more info than in the original page, maybe.

(By the way, is Chiro really 13? He looks like 9 or 10.. And is Chiro an orphan? Who is his mom? o_o)

And is my English readable? \o\'

I don't think there should be pages referring to separate characters from the show. After all, there isn't much material to work with, and anything else would be simply copying material from the characters' section as with the case of the article about Antauri (which by the way I'm sure was created by a devoted fan). The show has a lot of fans, but wasting Wikipedia space for fandom's sake just doesn't seem adequate.
Sorry

-REPLY: Several shows have separate pages for the characters. I don't see the problem with it. It may not seem useful now, but once people start putting up more information, it will seem more important. And yes, he's 13 and turns 14 in mid season 1. (Netbug009 at 19:22 3 June 2007)

Teleport Robot

Do we really need a section for such a minor villain? I mean he maid only one appearance (excluding "In the Grip of Evil"). Even Scraperton and Jinmay's pet monkey Sakko had a bigger role in the series. Why not just include a section about the minor villains in the show?T-borg 21:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-REPLY: A seperate page for the minor villains isn't a half bad idea. (Netbug009 at 19:23 3 June 2007)

This is getting absurd

It's pointless for separate articles about the characters and episodes to exist. Take for example the article about Antauri - it's totally copied from the main article and it serves no purpose. The main article needs to be expanded, it doesn't need to be "shortened", it's not at all that long. Plus I doubt anyone can expand those separate articles with info other than cruft. Think about it, Ok?T-borg 15:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-REPLY: Many series have separate pages fo the characters, but I say we keep the separate pages andrefer to them instead of repeating the same information on the show's main page. (Netbug009 at 19:16 3 June 2007)

Character articles

As I've said before it's totally useless. There's not enough info, the existing ones should be DELETED! So please stop linking the characters' names!-T-borg 13:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-REPLY: Why not instead of suggesting we remove them, you suggest we add more information to them? There's plenty that could be added like relationships, history, etc to make the character pages longer. (Netbug009 at 19:17 3 June 2007)

"After seeing the pictures from "http://www.hyperforce.ultranet.hu/"..."

Seems odd that a wiki-article has to refer to a forign fan-page for info. Wasn't season 4 aired in the US as well? Some other speculations in the article (like the Skeleton King being Chiro's father) has also been proved untrue, so I'm curious while they're still included. Harg 12:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-REPLY: It refers to this site because it's the largest screenshot gallery for the show at the momen unless you could the screenshot thread at MSMF. (Netbug009 at 19:18 3 June 2007)

New Mandarin Image

I added a new picture of Mandarin as undead. I thought it'd be better to show the current form of Mandarin rather than his giant-robot form. Shadowy Crafter 17:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Mark Hammill Irony?

I don't think the sentence about it being ironic that the hero of star wars plays a villainous evil-parent role makes any real sense, since his longest-lasting role was the Joker, and that's almost certainly how he got this role. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.73.48.43 (talk) 07:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Clean-up

It would be a good idea if the people who edit this page regularly monitored it more frequently, and attempted to clean up the bad spelling, grammar, and punctuation. I'm running automated searches for bad spelling, grammar, and punctuation, and just cleaned up this article five days ago. I'm back here again because AutoWikiBrowser indicates more problems have been edited in since then. For the record, "It's" mean "it has" or "it is"; it does not mean "belonging to it". Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 01:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done

I Just finnished Phase I of my expansion project on the page
now I'm Working on Phase II—Remember, the Edit will be with you, always. (Sethdoe92) (drop me a line) 22:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Just finnished Phase II of the expansion
now I'm working on Phase III—Remember, the Edit will be with you, always. (Sethdoe92) (drop me a line) 15:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Season 5 Info Edited

Somebody put "coming soon" under season 5 info. Seeing how there IS no season 5 due to Disney being money grubbers, I mean decided not to renew it, I've edited the section to make that more clear.

But got to be a faster way to save it right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.229.35 (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-REPLY: There's no hope of saving it at all unless the fans actually start helping. We have like, 3 or 4 people who have made a call, like 10 who have emailed. We need whole fandom help. Time is the least of our worries. --76.115.114.12 (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Characters Page Editing

I've heard several comments that the characters both having descriptions on the main article and is articles of their own is pointless. I have made it so the areas in the main article that once had the descriptions just link to the characters pages, and plan to expand on the character pages as well. (Netbug009 at 19:36 3 June 2007)

Fair use rationale for Image:New superrobot.png

Image:New superrobot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

Why were the list of episodes taken off?? I just saw it then.. and where it says 'list of episodes' it only has episode one! Other than that, it is a superb article! From EllaDinobert06 09:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]