Jump to content

Rachel Whitear: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
The initial police investigation was criticised for a failure to observe correct procedure, and the conclusions of the investigation were questioned. [[Fingerprint]]s were not taken until two weeks after police were first called to the scene and officers from the Devon and Cornwall Police force originally investigated the death without a post-mortem examination<ref>"[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/5406030.stm Fresh inquest into Whitear death]" at [[BBC News]]</ref>. [[Toxicology]] later revealed that the level of [[heroin]] in Rachel's bloodstream was 0.05 micrograms per millilitre, one third of the 0.15 μg/ml generally considered to be fatal. Because the case seemed to have been solved, no [[post-mortem]] examination was ordered. Two men were arrested in connection with her death, but were released without charge. Rachel's body was [[Burial#Exhumation|exhumed]] on [[23 March]] [[2004]], and a second investigation, by [[Wiltshire Police]], this time including a post-mortem. The inquest returned an [[open verdict]]. In October 2006, the High Court overturned the decision of Dr Elizabeth Earland, Exeter and Greater Devon District [[Coroner]], not to grant a request for a new inquest, after evidence from Russell Fortt, counsel for Chief Superintendent Paul Howlett of Wiltshire Police, told the court there had been a "highly material failure to carry out reliable toxicology tests which was compounded by the failure to carry out a post-mortem". He said that a significant body of evidence now existed which was not previously before the coroner. Additionally, there has been speculation that Rachel may have been killed by her boyfriend<ref>"[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article616779.ece Rachel 'killed by Jilted Lover']", The Sunday Times, October 29, 2006 </ref>.
The initial police investigation was criticised for a failure to observe correct procedure, and the conclusions of the investigation were questioned. [[Fingerprint]]s were not taken until two weeks after police were first called to the scene and officers from the Devon and Cornwall Police force originally investigated the death without a post-mortem examination<ref>"[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/5406030.stm Fresh inquest into Whitear death]" at [[BBC News]]</ref>. [[Toxicology]] later revealed that the level of [[heroin]] in Rachel's bloodstream was 0.05 micrograms per millilitre, one third of the 0.15 μg/ml generally considered to be fatal. Because the case seemed to have been solved, no [[post-mortem]] examination was ordered. Two men were arrested in connection with her death, but were released without charge. Rachel's body was [[Burial#Exhumation|exhumed]] on [[23 March]] [[2004]], and a second investigation, by [[Wiltshire Police]], this time including a post-mortem. The inquest returned an [[open verdict]]. In October 2006, the High Court overturned the decision of Dr Elizabeth Earland, Exeter and Greater Devon District [[Coroner]], not to grant a request for a new inquest, after evidence from Russell Fortt, counsel for Chief Superintendent Paul Howlett of Wiltshire Police, told the court there had been a "highly material failure to carry out reliable toxicology tests which was compounded by the failure to carry out a post-mortem". He said that a significant body of evidence now existed which was not previously before the coroner. Additionally, there has been speculation that Rachel may have been killed by her boyfriend<ref>"[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article616779.ece Rachel 'killed by Jilted Lover']", The Sunday Times, October 29, 2006 </ref>.


A painting of Rachel by [[Stella Vine]], showing her with blood coming from her mouth, caused controversy during the second investigation when the police backed the calls of Rachel's parents for it not to be part of the [[Saatchi Gallery]] exhibition, ''New Blood''. Despite the controversy however, it was not withdrawn.<ref>[[16 March]] [[2004]] "[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hereford/worcs/3514866.stm Rachel portrait 'appals' family]" at BBC News.</ref>
A painting of Rachel by [[Stella Vine]], showing her with blood coming from her mouth, caused controversy during the second investigation when the police backed the calls of Rachel's parents for it not to be part of the [[Saatchi Gallery]] exhibition, ''New Blood''. Despite the controversy however, it was not withdrawn.<ref>[[16 March]] [[2004]] "[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hereford/worcs/3514866.stm Rachel portrait 'appals' family]" at BBC News.</ref> Her parents are considering legal action against the [[BNP]], who used the photograph of Rachel's body in a political leaflet.<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hereford/worcs/7287139.stm</ref> The BNP have refused to apologise for the use of the image.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 10:55, 17 July 2008

A school photograph of Rachel.
Rachel's discoloured body collapsed in the fetal position.

Rachel Whitear (1979 - May 2000) was a British student from Ledbury, Herefordshire who died following a heroin overdose. Her death in May 2000 led to a large-scale anti-drugs campaign in Britain, particularly in secondary schools, when her parents allowed a police photograph to be shown publicly – it showed her discoloured body collapsed in the foetal position. The school campaign was centred on a 22-minute video called Rachel's Story. The campaign was seen as an equivalent of the anti-ecstasy drive undertaken after the death of British school girl Leah Betts in 1995 and a parallel incident culminating in the death of Anna Wood in Sydney, Australia.

Rachel was twenty-one years old when she died, having been found dead in her bedsit in Exmouth, Devon, by her landlord. The image portrayed in the campaigns was that of a normal, everyday girl, with the message that it could happen to anyone.

The initial police investigation was criticised for a failure to observe correct procedure, and the conclusions of the investigation were questioned. Fingerprints were not taken until two weeks after police were first called to the scene and officers from the Devon and Cornwall Police force originally investigated the death without a post-mortem examination[1]. Toxicology later revealed that the level of heroin in Rachel's bloodstream was 0.05 micrograms per millilitre, one third of the 0.15 μg/ml generally considered to be fatal. Because the case seemed to have been solved, no post-mortem examination was ordered. Two men were arrested in connection with her death, but were released without charge. Rachel's body was exhumed on 23 March 2004, and a second investigation, by Wiltshire Police, this time including a post-mortem. The inquest returned an open verdict. In October 2006, the High Court overturned the decision of Dr Elizabeth Earland, Exeter and Greater Devon District Coroner, not to grant a request for a new inquest, after evidence from Russell Fortt, counsel for Chief Superintendent Paul Howlett of Wiltshire Police, told the court there had been a "highly material failure to carry out reliable toxicology tests which was compounded by the failure to carry out a post-mortem". He said that a significant body of evidence now existed which was not previously before the coroner. Additionally, there has been speculation that Rachel may have been killed by her boyfriend[2].

A painting of Rachel by Stella Vine, showing her with blood coming from her mouth, caused controversy during the second investigation when the police backed the calls of Rachel's parents for it not to be part of the Saatchi Gallery exhibition, New Blood. Despite the controversy however, it was not withdrawn.[3] Her parents are considering legal action against the BNP, who used the photograph of Rachel's body in a political leaflet.[4] The BNP have refused to apologise for the use of the image.

References