Christian Institute: Difference between revisions
This seems to have come up before - This is a cut and paste exact quote: I agree that the Guardian should know better, but their errors should remain uncorrected. |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The Christian Institute's activities resulted in [[censure]] by The Charity Commission in 2001 for breaching the rules limiting overt political campaigning by charities: |
The Christian Institute's activities resulted in [[censure]] by The Charity Commission in 2001 for breaching the rules limiting overt political campaigning by charities: |
||
::"The Charity Commission has criticised the right |
::"The Charity Commission has criticised the right-wing religious pressure group behind the [[Tory]] peer's campaign against the repeal of Clause 28 for breaching the terms of its charitable status. It has ordered the Christian Institute to change its subtitle, 'influencing public policy', and accused it of engaging in politics. The [[Newcastle upon Tyne|Newcastle]]-based charity, supported by hardline Christian evangelicals, lobbied hard to support [[Janet_Young%2C_Baroness_Young|Lady Young]]'s campaign in the [[House of Lords]] to defeat government attempts to repeal Clause 28, intended to prevent 'promotion' of homosexuality in schools and by local authorities." <ref>''[[The Guardian]]'', 23rd. August, [[2001]], page 7</ref>. |
||
In May 2008, the CI funded<ref>[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1020809/Christian-registrar-threatened-sack-refusing-conduct-gay-marriages.html Christian registrar 'threatened with sack' after refusing to conduct gay marriages | Mail Online<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> the legal costs of Lillian Ladele, a [[Registrar General|registrar]] from [[Islington]], [[London]], who took legal action against her employer, Islington Council. Ladele claimed that her employer's actions, when she refused to conduct [[civil partnerships]] on religious grounds, constituted bullying and dicrimination. Islington Council denied the accusation, counter-claiming that Ladele discriminated against gay people. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7413298.stm BBC NEWS | England | London | Registrars 'in fear' over beliefs<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> In July 2008, the tribunal hearing the case found in Ladele's favour, however her employer is to appeal the ruling. <ref>http://www.24dash.com/news/Communities/2008-07-15-Islington-Council-to-appeal-against-discrimination-ruling-in-civil-partnerships-case</ref> |
In May 2008, the CI funded<ref>[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1020809/Christian-registrar-threatened-sack-refusing-conduct-gay-marriages.html Christian registrar 'threatened with sack' after refusing to conduct gay marriages | Mail Online<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> the legal costs of Lillian Ladele, a [[Registrar General|registrar]] from [[Islington]], [[London]], who took legal action against her employer, Islington Council. Ladele claimed that her employer's actions, when she refused to conduct [[civil partnerships]] on religious grounds, constituted bullying and dicrimination. Islington Council denied the accusation, counter-claiming that Ladele discriminated against gay people. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7413298.stm BBC NEWS | England | London | Registrars 'in fear' over beliefs<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> In July 2008, the tribunal hearing the case found in Ladele's favour, however her employer is to appeal the ruling. <ref>http://www.24dash.com/news/Communities/2008-07-15-Islington-Council-to-appeal-against-discrimination-ruling-in-civil-partnerships-case</ref> |
Revision as of 17:17, 17 July 2008
The Christian Institute (CI) is a British contemporary evangelical Christian registered charity. The CI promotes a Conservative Christian viewpoint, including that the Bible is inerrant and should be the authority on all of life.[1][2]
The CI has campaigned on issues including gambling, abortion and euthanasia. It is most notable for its unsuccessful campaigns against gay rights. The CI sought to retain Section 28 and an unequal age of consent for homosexuals. The CI opposed The Civil Partnership Act, legislation giving gay couples the right to adopt, and measures to prevent gay people being discriminated against in the provision of services and goods. All these pieces of legislation were ultimately enacted by Parliament.
In 2000 the CI became the only group to take a case to court for an alleged breach of the now defunct Section 28. The case failed.
In 2004 the CI funded a full-page advertisement in The Times newspaper in support of a controversial amendment to the Civil Partnership Bill. The amendment attempted to include within the scope of the Bill siblings who had lived together for longer than 12 years.[3] The amendment was ultimately rejected both in both Houses of Parliament. In response to the advertisement, Members of Parliament questioned the CI's overt political campaigning in light of its charitable status.[4]
In 2007, the CI and others unsuccessfully sought a judicial review of the Sexual Orientation Regulations in Northern Ireland.
The Christian Institute's activities resulted in censure by The Charity Commission in 2001 for breaching the rules limiting overt political campaigning by charities:
- "The Charity Commission has criticised the right-wing religious pressure group behind the Tory peer's campaign against the repeal of Clause 28 for breaching the terms of its charitable status. It has ordered the Christian Institute to change its subtitle, 'influencing public policy', and accused it of engaging in politics. The Newcastle-based charity, supported by hardline Christian evangelicals, lobbied hard to support Lady Young's campaign in the House of Lords to defeat government attempts to repeal Clause 28, intended to prevent 'promotion' of homosexuality in schools and by local authorities." [5].
In May 2008, the CI funded[6] the legal costs of Lillian Ladele, a registrar from Islington, London, who took legal action against her employer, Islington Council. Ladele claimed that her employer's actions, when she refused to conduct civil partnerships on religious grounds, constituted bullying and dicrimination. Islington Council denied the accusation, counter-claiming that Ladele discriminated against gay people. [7] In July 2008, the tribunal hearing the case found in Ladele's favour, however her employer is to appeal the ruling. [8]
See also
References
- ^ Christian.org
- ^ Extract from the Central Register of Charities maintained by the Charity Commission for England and Wales
- ^ UK Parliament Publications
- ^ House of Commons Hansard Debates for 9 Nov 2004 (pt 18)
- ^ The Guardian, 23rd. August, 2001, page 7
- ^ Christian registrar 'threatened with sack' after refusing to conduct gay marriages | Mail Online
- ^ BBC NEWS | England | London | Registrars 'in fear' over beliefs
- ^ http://www.24dash.com/news/Communities/2008-07-15-Islington-Council-to-appeal-against-discrimination-ruling-in-civil-partnerships-case