Jump to content

The Burke Group: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rgcroc (talk | contribs)
34 edits
m →Operations: Deleted sentence regarding amounts paid to TBG. Untrue statement. Amounts were paid to LIS...separate corp verified thru DOL gov. site
Rgcroc (talk | contribs)
34 edits
m →Business: Deleted paragraph. The data is not found in the corresponding citation. It describes "generic" tactics as written by Martin Levitt, not TBG, belongs in Union buster post, not here
Line 7: Line 7:


<blockquote>"will demonstrate their conviction to remain union free by exercising their right to vote and by making an "informed" decision. TBG possesses the professional expertise at all levels of a union's organizing efforts that guarantees that the voting unit will be "informed". </blockquote>
<blockquote>"will demonstrate their conviction to remain union free by exercising their right to vote and by making an "informed" decision. TBG possesses the professional expertise at all levels of a union's organizing efforts that guarantees that the voting unit will be "informed". </blockquote>

TBG recommends that employers use their management staff to meet workers individually in an attempt to strongly persuade them of the perceived disadvantages of voting to be a part of a union. This may include arguing that a union will decrease pay, that workers could end up on strikes all the time, and that unions would harass them at their homes.<ref>Logan, ''U.S. Anti-Union Consultants: A Threat to the Rights of British Workers'' (2008) pp.6</ref>


TBG Labor also operates a subsidiary called ''Labor Information Services'' specialising in persuading employees to not join a union.<ref>See the Labor Information Services [http://www.laborinformationservices.com/ website]</ref> According to their webpage, the LIS is necessary because the
TBG Labor also operates a subsidiary called ''Labor Information Services'' specialising in persuading employees to not join a union.<ref>See the Labor Information Services [http://www.laborinformationservices.com/ website]</ref> According to their webpage, the LIS is necessary because the

Revision as of 01:11, 23 July 2008

The Burke Group (TBG Labor for short) is a Malibu based American management consultancy, established in 1982.[1] It is the largest management consultancy for "union avoidance and preventative industrial labor relations."[2] TBG offers advice to employers and services on keeping workplaces "union free",[3] also known as the practice of union busting.

The CEO and President of TBG is David J. Burke. He is a resident of Agoura Hills, California and a regular donor to the US Republican party.[4]

Business

TBG Labor assists employers in developing communications during union organizing and recognition campaigns, so that employees gain comprehensive understanding of collective bargaining and how it will impact them. According to its website, employees considering a union,

"will demonstrate their conviction to remain union free by exercising their right to vote and by making an "informed" decision. TBG possesses the professional expertise at all levels of a union's organizing efforts that guarantees that the voting unit will be "informed".

TBG Labor also operates a subsidiary called Labor Information Services specialising in persuading employees to not join a union.[5] According to their webpage, the LIS is necessary because the "recent influx of non English speaking workers (predominantly Hispanic workers) throughout U.S. industries has made communications (third party persuading) to a company’s workforce a major challenge." Their consultants talk can talk to workers in "English, Spanish, Tagalong (sic), French, Portuguese, Vietnamese as well as several dialects of Chinese."

TBG has a strong privacy policy for employers to consult in confidence.[6]

Operations

  • Honeywell, 12 October 2001 CAC Ballot, Employees voted 64 to 26 against union recognition.
  • Amazon, 12 Sept 2001 ACAS voluntary petition, Employees voted 188 to 35 against union recognition.
  • G.E. Calidonia, 29 May 2002, CAC Ballot, Employees voted 449 to 223 against union recognition.
  • Silberline 12 Nov 2002, ACAS, Employees voted 42 to 27 against union recognition.
  • Chinese Daily News, March 2001, 150 employees of Monterey Park California (U.S.) voted 78-63 to join the CWA (Communications Workers of America) and its member union, the Newspaper Guild. TBG consultant Larry Wong was hired to advise CDN and union recognition was contested. As a result, The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled to overturn the March 2001 election due to "supervisory taint" and ordered a new election. [7] Note: In the U.S. supervisors are not permitted to take part in card signing or be members of the bargaining unit.
  • Calor Gas, 18 Feb 2003, ACAS, Employees voted 43 to 14 against union recognition.
  • Virgin Air, 21 May 2003, ACAS Employees voted 450 to 99 against union recognition.
  • T-mobile, May 2003, ACAS, TBG sent 7 minute videos to 550 employees homes to convince them to not vote for recognition of the Communication Workers Union. T-Mobile employees on 8 May 2003 voted 351 to 170 against union recognition.[8]
  • FlyBe, 2006, 400 cabin crew tried to join the union Unite. Two (2) TBG consultants worked for just over 4 weeks. There was no anti-union campaign, and no videos were produced or distributed. FlyBe hired TBG to secure a ballot for good industrial relations: this was accomplished and TBG's services ended. Employees voted 94% (89% turnout) in favour of union recognition.
  • Cable & Wireless, August 2007, employed TBG when the Communication Workers Union sought recognition 330 at the Central Arbitration Committee.[9] In June 2008 359 ballots were issued and 331 returned representing a 92% vote turnout whereby the Cable and Wireless employees voted 254 to 77 against union recognition. [10]
  • Kettle Chips, With advice from TBG the company persuaded the Central Arbitration Committee to include office workers as part of a larger bargaining unit. TBG argued to workers that there would be a greater threat of strike if the union won. Subsequently 2 Facebook campaigns were launched to boycott Kettle Chips for its involvement with TBG.[11] Kettle then hired PR firm Hill and Knowlton to improve their image.[12] October 2007, Kettle Chips workers voted against union recognition 206 to 93[13].

See also

Template:Organized labour portal

Notes

  1. ^ This should not be confused with the Canadian temporary worker and human resources recruitment agency by the same name, est. 1979. For the Canadian firm, see The Burke Group's website.
  2. ^ The Burke Group Labor Relations Consultation to Management website
  3. ^ TBG Labor website, outlining its union free strategies
  4. ^ see, the Huffington Post 'Fundrace 2008' website; see CampaignMoney.com's search for David Burke, for 2004 and 2006
  5. ^ See the Labor Information Services website
  6. ^ see, TBG Labor's privacy policy webpage
  7. ^ http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m5072/is_33_27/ai_n15400243, Chinese Daily News workers face second vote on unionization"]
  8. ^ BBC News, Unions attack mobile phone firm, June 2, 2003
  9. ^ C&W's 'union busters' spark fury, The Independent, 19 August 2007
  10. ^ http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2008/06/24/46442/cwu-fails-to-win-recognition-bid-at-cable-wireless.html "CWU Fails to Win Recognition bid at Cable & Wireless"]
  11. ^ see, Boycott Kettle Chips: the anti-Trade Union snack and boycott kettle crisps for attacks on workers on Facebook
  12. ^ David Hencke, 'Has Kettle had its chips?', The Guardian
  13. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/oct/13/uk.tradeunions "Workers at Kettle Foods vote against joining union"]

References

Union avoidance/busting firms
News reports involving TBG Labor
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Burke_Group&oldid=227320910"