Talk:OpenOffice Impress: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
WP:COMPUTING Tagging ( False Postive ?? ) :(Plugin++) Added {{WikiProject Computing}}. |
→Contents: new section |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Key advantage == |
== Key advantage == |
||
I marked the statement about Impress's "key advantage" over PowerPoint being its open source nature. It is certainly open source, but there is no reference to say that this is Impress's key advantage. [[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]] 22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC) |
I marked the statement about Impress's "key advantage" over PowerPoint being its open source nature. It is certainly open source, but there is no reference to say that this is Impress's key advantage. [[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]] 22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Contents == |
|||
This page should probably have the contents summary at the top rather than most of the way down, and the main body of text could then be labelled something like 'overview'. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/124.179.56.184|124.179.56.184]] ([[User talk:124.179.56.184|talk]]) 11:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:27, 23 July 2008
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the OpenOffice Impress redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Computing Redirect‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
| Computing Redirect‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
STUB?
Isint this a stub? can anyone add the appropriate stub tag? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The editor1 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
Key advantage
I marked the statement about Impress's "key advantage" over PowerPoint being its open source nature. It is certainly open source, but there is no reference to say that this is Impress's key advantage. Sancho 22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Contents
This page should probably have the contents summary at the top rather than most of the way down, and the main body of text could then be labelled something like 'overview'. 124.179.56.184 (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)