Jump to content

Talk:The Sheaf: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m +assessment
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
Yeah, I agree. In the meantime, I edited the Capitalist Piglet article. I snipped out the bits about supposed Christian hypocrisy re: Muslim cartoons. Real or not, Wikipedia is not the place for this. I snipped out a couple of other violations of NPOV.
Yeah, I agree. In the meantime, I edited the Capitalist Piglet article. I snipped out the bits about supposed Christian hypocrisy re: Muslim cartoons. Real or not, Wikipedia is not the place for this. I snipped out a couple of other violations of NPOV.
--Smo December 28, 06
--Smo December 28, 06


==Capitalist Piglet==

Definitely warrants mention in the article. It achieved international attention and resulted in the forced resignation of the editor-in-chief. The comic is arguably more notable than the paper itself. --[[Special:Contributions/96.52.132.224|96.52.132.224]] ([[User talk:96.52.132.224|talk]]) 09:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:17, 24 July 2008

WikiProject iconCanada: Saskatchewan Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.



IMO Capitalist Piglet should have its own article.

Then add a page. Someone keeps deleting this entry and I have no idea what to do.

None of this stuff has any citations. It's a very detailed article, and there are no links to other sources verifying its veracity. (I realize that most everything stated here is true, but this is still the way Wiki works). And perhaps there is too much focus on the Capitalist Piglet scandal. --Aylwinatrix Dec 27, 06

Yeah, I agree. In the meantime, I edited the Capitalist Piglet article. I snipped out the bits about supposed Christian hypocrisy re: Muslim cartoons. Real or not, Wikipedia is not the place for this. I snipped out a couple of other violations of NPOV. --Smo December 28, 06


Capitalist Piglet

Definitely warrants mention in the article. It achieved international attention and resulted in the forced resignation of the editor-in-chief. The comic is arguably more notable than the paper itself. --96.52.132.224 (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]