User talk:Ragemanchoo

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ragemanchoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason for unblock

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= your reason for unblock  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= your reason for unblock  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= your reason for unblock  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

Ragemanchoo (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

---

IP address: 71.59.165.208 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Toddst1 (talk • blocks)
Block message:

[[WP:CIVIL|Incivility]]: repeated incivility

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Ragemanchoo}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Toddst1 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:CIVIL|Incivility]]: repeated incivility</nowiki> | 3=71.59.165.208 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=71.59.165.208 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:CIVIL|Incivility]]: repeated incivility</nowiki> | 3=Toddst1 | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=71.59.165.208 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:CIVIL|Incivility]]: repeated incivility</nowiki> | 3=Toddst1 | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

^ What does this mean, anyway?

I was blocked for violating the three revert rule. I apologize for this and promise not to do it again. If unblocked, I'm not going to continue reverting. Instead, I will attempt to find a compromise on the talk page, and if that doesn't work, I'll try dispute resolution.

The blocking policy states that blocks are not a punishment, but a means to prevent future problems. Because I've promised not to cause any more problems, my block no longer serves a purpose allowed by the blocking policy. Therefore, I request to be unblocked.