Talk:Anonymous (hacker group): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:54, 12 September 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anonymous (hacker group) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 14 days

Internet culture C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Template:Multidel

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

For Great Justice!

Quote from the article: 'Anonymous typically justifies their actions by claiming that the raids are "for great justice"'. Heheh...Noboy else notice this meme, or has it been mentioned elsewhere? Ah well, I got a kick out of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.15.120 (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Racism? Justice? Anonymous cares not for such things. Anonymous did it for the lulz! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.244.181 (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Turner

So like... Hal... there should be media on him right? More power to the hate! Kakama (talk) 02:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please no

This article shouldnt exist there is no anonymous group —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.207.87 (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

shut up anon, i the Moskus will bring you down —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.220.102.253 (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest a merge into Ebaumsworld. ;] 67.83.34.119 (talk) 06:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there is nothing in this page that can be verified. Why does this page exist? "Anonymous" is a myth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.81.181.101 (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Over 9000?

I haven't read the Variety article referenced in the text, but that's more likely the "Over 9000" an in joke. I'll change the article to reflect it. (I can't demonstrate because Over 9000 is presently locked.)

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 20:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protected

Due to the recent edit warring this page has been protected for 48 hours. Please use the time to discuss the matter here and come to a consensus on what should and shouldn't be included on the page. If an urgent edit needs to be made during the protection, please place the template {{editprotected}} here with details of the edit that needs to be made and justification for the edit, and an administrator will come by to make the edit. If you have agreed and resolved the dispute before the expiry of the protection, please make a listing at requests for unprotection. While it is also possible to make such requests on my talk page, it would be quicker for you to use those previous methods. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, never mind. I got two articles mixed up. Stifle (talk) 11:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

anon is going down hahahahahahahaahahahaahaha

bye bye

row row fight the powa of the Moskus, but you faoil dearly —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sno777 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misguiding

The article fails to even mention that anon and 4chan are a network of pedos, rapists and murderers. It's disgusting.--85.200.108.5 (talk) 12:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 row row fight the powa of the Moskus, but you faoil dearly  <span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sno777|Sno777]] ([[User talk:Sno777|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sno777|contribs]]) 21:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Misguiding ==
+The article fails to even mention that anon and 4chan are a network of pedos, rapists and murderers. It's disgusting.--[[Special:Contributions/85.200.108.5|85.200.108.5]] ([[User talk:85.200.108.5|talk]]) 12:54, 12 September 2008 (UTC)