User talk:Canada Supreme

Apparantly I've been blocked for speaking the truth, and that WikiMedia is siding with companies that side with people who breach the 1st amendment, content is not libelous if it's true, and WikiMedia needs you realise this, learn what the right to free speech is.

September 2008

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Blogtalkradio. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy also, we activly disallow your right to free speech and you're not allowed to say anything bad about a company, we will also bully you by blocking you. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-06t22:03z 22:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

BlogTalkRadio abuse the human rights of Americans who extert their right to free speech bully the intelligent web 2.0 generation (talk) 22:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

The content added, aside from not all being by myself, is opinion, and their staff deleting it is in breach of the first amendment, they delete the content which shows their frequent controvrsial actions, and the material is referenced, as shown by the links, however, the BlogTalkRadio staff remove this, so they make me look bad. I resent being bullied like this, and feel you should also confront BlogTalkRadio on their illegal actions, please don't side with a corperation that breaches the first amendment. If you want proof of the referenced material, check out The Corbett Report, as well as multiple video's on YouTube, as well as dozens of blogs which can be found by a Google search, they cause controversial actions by abusing the human rights of people, then hide behind false claims of abuse, when it's the people willing to show the good with the bad about BTR. As mentioned, BTR has many good qualities, but if they don't want people to see their bad qualities too, perhaps they might want to read our contitution as well as consulting with the UN on human rights. I am not posting any information that isn't true. By the way your threats could also be seen as controversional content, remember it's not slander or defamatory if it's true, and I'd appreciate it if you researched my information in greater detail before you bully me in such a manner, people have been banned for talking about left wing opinions that BTR don't agree with see for yourself.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for inserting libellous informations and not adhering to our neutral point of view policy. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

BlogTalkRadio abuse the human rights of Americans who extert their right to free speech bully the intelligent web 2.0 generation (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Canada Supreme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}