User talk:Canada Supreme

Apparantly I've been blocked for speaking the truth, and that WikiMedia is siding with companies that side with people who breach the 1st amendment, content is not libelous if it's true, and WikiMedia needs you realise this, learn what the right to free speech is.

September 2008[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Blogtalkradio. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy also, we activly disallow your right to free speech and you're not allowed to say anything bad about a company, we will also bully you by blocking you. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-06t22:03z 22:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BlogTalkRadio abuse the human rights of Americans who extert their right to free speech bully the intelligent web 2.0 generation (talk) 22:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

The content added, aside from not all being by myself, is opinion, and their staff deleting it is in breach of the first amendment, they delete the content which shows their frequent controvrsial actions, and the material is referenced, as shown by the links, however, the BlogTalkRadio staff remove this, so they make me look bad. I resent being bullied like this, and feel you should also confront BlogTalkRadio on their illegal actions, please don't side with a corperation that breaches the first amendment. If you want proof of the referenced material, check out The Corbett Report, as well as multiple video's on YouTube, as well as dozens of blogs which can be found by a Google search, they cause controversial actions by abusing the human rights of people, then hide behind false claims of abuse, when it's the people willing to show the good with the bad about BTR. As mentioned, BTR has many good qualities, but if they don't want people to see their bad qualities too, perhaps they might want to read our contitution as well as consulting with the UN on human rights. I am not posting any information that isn't true. By the way your threats could also be seen as controversional content, remember it's not slander or defamatory if it's true, and I'd appreciate it if you researched my information in greater detail before you bully me in such a manner, people have been banned for talking about left wing opinions that BTR don't agree with see for yourself.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for inserting libellous informations and not adhering to our neutral point of view policy. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BlogTalkRadio abuse the human rights of Americans who extert their right to free speech bully the intelligent web 2.0 generation (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canada Supreme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am being neutral the page is speaking all the good and is a shameless advert for BlogTalkRadio which they are editing themselves to provide advertisement, and my information is good as well as negative, hence neutral as for the information being libelous the information is true, hence not libelous and is an infringement of my right to the first amendment as an American, for proof of the claims about BlogTalkRadio discriminating against people and the 1st amendment, here are just a few pages with information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikTLt-y7-dE and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwIOErvyRyE and http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20080510_blogtalkradio.htm as any person who respect the constitution and isn't a power-hungry ego-tripper can see, the information provided is factual and provides evidence, BlogTalkRadio and the ban itself is an infringement to the 1st amendment, thank-you for your time, and hoping to receive a favourable and constitutional reply

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Your block will remain unless you can demonstrate and understanding of our WP:NPOV and WP:Reliable sources policies. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.