Jump to content

User talk:Ragemanchoo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Unblock declined.
Ragemanchoo (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


^ What does this mean, anyway?
^ What does this mean, anyway?



It means you were being rude to someone. Tone down the anger and don't be so hostile in some of your comments. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 06:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
It means you were being rude to someone. Tone down the anger and don't be so hostile in some of your comments. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 06:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

What do I do from here? BTW a girl ("Luna") responded to my email but then stopped when I had more questions. I'm really going to need to be unblocked, if only for correcting the typos/link errors, etc. I come across while browsing. I'm also going to need a concrete email address I can report problems and problem people to. That sock puppet bullshit I was getting spammed with a few months back is a prime example. --[[User:Ragemanchoo|Ragemanchoo]] ([[User talk:Ragemanchoo#top|talk]]) 05:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:47, 14 September 2008

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ragemanchoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked for violating the three revert rule. I apologize for this and promise not to do it again. If unblocked, I'm not going to continue reverting. Instead, I will attempt to find a compromise on the talk page, and if that doesn't work, I'll try dispute resolution. The blocking policy states that blocks are not a punishment, but a means to prevent future problems. Because I've promised not to cause any more problems, my block no longer serves a purpose allowed by the blocking policy. Therefore, I request to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

You've copy-pasted the wrong example from WP:GAB. You are blocked for incivility, not 3RR. —  Sandstein  07:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock-ip|1=71.59.165.208|2=[[WP:CIVIL|Incivility]]: repeated incivility|3=Toddst1}

^ What does this mean, anyway?

It means you were being rude to someone. Tone down the anger and don't be so hostile in some of your comments. -- Ned Scott 06:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do I do from here? BTW a girl ("Luna") responded to my email but then stopped when I had more questions. I'm really going to need to be unblocked, if only for correcting the typos/link errors, etc. I come across while browsing. I'm also going to need a concrete email address I can report problems and problem people to. That sock puppet bullshit I was getting spammed with a few months back is a prime example. --Ragemanchoo (talk) 05:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]