Jump to content

Talk:Sabra and Shatila massacre: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:


:I think that is a much fairer edit. Thank you. [[User:Jd2718|Jd2718]] ([[User talk:Jd2718|talk]]) 11:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
:I think that is a much fairer edit. Thank you. [[User:Jd2718|Jd2718]] ([[User talk:Jd2718|talk]]) 11:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
NYTimes Thomas Friedman is known to be often very critical of Israel and if he ties it as a REVENGE for Damour it sounds very objective.
- That 'Shahid' source is clearly a loner POV push.
- It is very important, Hobeika's own personal tragedy at Damour to understand his motives.
- The 'follow up' boasting by Falangists about the Christian Arab massacre at Sabra is highly important.
- The 'mysterious' assassination of Elie Hobeika that no one more than him knew that Israel had no hand in it should be noted as well.


[[User:Malindas|Malindas]] ([[User talk:Malindas|talk]]) 22:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:40, 15 September 2008

WikiProject iconPalestine B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLebanon B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Indirect responsibility" is not the same as "perpetrators"

Bearing "indirect responsibility" is not the same as being a "perpetrator" of a massacre. Please use the fields of the infobox for their intended purpose. Jayjg (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge?

Qarantina, Damour, Tel Az-zataar occurred immediately after each other. (January 18, 1976, January 20, 1976, and August 1976 after a siege that started in June). But Sabra and Shatila? The claims that these were revenge are tenuous, and rely on complicated explanations. This is the reason why the sources I have removed have been either marginal, or extremely pro-Israel. Jd2718 (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the reference and dropped the Damour claim. I think it is more accurate as it stands, acknowledging the history. It certainly was a "revenge" attack but not for Damour specifically. The history is made a bit clearer in the Bachir Gemayel article, as well as the Kahan report [1]. Hope this is better. Tundrabuggy (talk) 06:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a much fairer edit. Thank you. Jd2718 (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYTimes Thomas Friedman is known to be often very critical of Israel and if he ties it as a REVENGE for Damour it sounds very objective. - That 'Shahid' source is clearly a loner POV push. - It is very important, Hobeika's own personal tragedy at Damour to understand his motives. - The 'follow up' boasting by Falangists about the Christian Arab massacre at Sabra is highly important. - The 'mysterious' assassination of Elie Hobeika that no one more than him knew that Israel had no hand in it should be noted as well.


Malindas (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]