Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II: The Rise of the Witch-king

It seems that there will be an eighth faction as well. If you look closely in the "Shade of the wolf" Image in this article, the swordsmen and archers seem to have different style armor than that of the men of the west or the elves. It looks similar to the last alliance. I wouldn't be surprised... the sprites already exist from the intro to the first BFME, and if this is a thousand or so years in the past, then they would fit into the cannon. (Despite being far removed from the second age

Also, the games from EA have traditionally had two different campaigns... if there is an Evil one. Thus, there would likely be a good campaign as well.

According to Tolken lore, (and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-king_of_Angmar) the witch king was defeated by a joint effort by men end elves. Perhaps this new camping will have a "Full cycle" storyline, instead of the two separate timelines seen in the previous BFME games.

AFAIK this "eighth faction" is Arnor, but only available as an opponent in the bad campaign. Arnor is an "older MotW".

How about using a colon rather than a little dash? Uthanc 08:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be merged into the BFME2 article?--ANDY+MCI=Andy Mci 09:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Computer and video games with limited editions

I don't think this article should be categorized as Computer and video games with limited editions since there is no existing Collector's Edition, Limited Edition, or Special Edition related to it. The main game (The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II) has a Collector's Edition, but it does not imply that this expansion pack has also its own Collector's Edition. Darth Narutorious 15:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

xbox 360

Is this expansion not available for xbox 360 - I will remove the references to xbox 360 for now.

Tone

I dropped a tag because gameplay needs to be in a prose format, the missions should not have that many subsections, and characters should probably go.--Clyde (talk) 20:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

New Tolkien-derived stuff

Anyone want to write about the original stuff this game has (probably 90% of it)? Uthanc 17:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

arnor in 2.02

The first sentence under gameplay changes is false. EA are probably not going to patch this game again, and are definitely not adding a new faction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.199.97 (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

While I agree it's unlikely to happen, there's still a chance. Either way, since there has been no official word, I indicated it as a rumor.Solinx 00:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I think such a rumour still needs a citation. Also, a reference to the unofficial 2.02 patch about to be released by www.gamereplays.org, which tackles all the major balance issues and bugs, would be useful in my opinion. Gamereplays has made patches for EA in the past and, if there ever is an official 2.02, this will be it (although this is still unlikely). 86.134.147.182 (talk) 12:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Karsh

Is the information in the sub section for Karsh really necessary? I don't see how describing how his performance on a -95% handicap and his leveling speed is contributing to the article.Alexander Le Fey (talk) 21:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

CD codes are bullshit.

i boought this for $10...and come to find out theres no CD code in there...screw you Computer Palace! and screw you Lord of the ring guys! cus whats it casasins creed didnt need a cd code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.53.219.20 (talk) 18:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

^^^ Idiot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.65.60 (talk) 13:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

manne

(tLOtR:tBFMEII:tROtWK)

can we remove this,
does anyone call it this
I dont think anyone calls it this
this is absurd
fuck

--71.101.33.94 (talk) 09:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)