Jump to content

User talk:Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎WTF: Question
Line 46: Line 46:
Are you a fucking moron dude? Citing sources? The article itself says that it's a theory, all I said was that there are many theories as to what they actually relate to, that information is highly flawed.
Are you a fucking moron dude? Citing sources? The article itself says that it's a theory, all I said was that there are many theories as to what they actually relate to, that information is highly flawed.
:Okay, so can you provide a source to state that? Or is that statement entirely [[WP:NOR|original research]] on your part? &mdash;/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 01:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
:Okay, so can you provide a source to state that? Or is that statement entirely [[WP:NOR|original research]] on your part? &mdash;/[[User:Mendaliv|<b>M</b><small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 01:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

LMAO, the source lies in this"

Andrew H. Gordon and Calvin W. Schwabe speculated that the Ankh, Djed and Was symbols were derived from"

IT SAYS THEY SPECULATED, I shouldn't have to go find a book with some author telling you that NOBODY FUCKING KNOWS WHAT THEY MEAN! AND YOU SHOULDN'T MISLEAD PEOPLE ON WIKIPEDIA BY TELLING what one theory is, and not ANY other single theory.

Revision as of 01:12, 28 September 2008

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Level 4
Level 4

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[viewpurgeupdate]


3.13 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 22:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SmackBot

Thanks, that particular template is a headache. I'll get it fixed. Rich Farmbrough, 18:52 17 August 2008 (GMT).

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Eden

I see at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Eden that you sorted this into Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians. It seems to me that this should have gotten sorted into Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Chicago as well. Then we might have saved it. Not much has gotten sorted into our project. Do you know why?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, frankly I still don't consider the subject to be notable. But in any case, it might simply be that not many obviously Chicago-related articles are getting nommed for deletion; Jeff Eden wasn't obviously Chicago-related, apart from an unexplained tagging as being part of WP Chicago. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 05:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Abbiati

I don't know how to add a footnote reference/link and it is not clear where I look to find such information. The article where Christian Abbiati says he is a fascist is this http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/27/italy.acmilan Could you add the proper footnote reference then please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.18.24 (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing; I've fixed it up. I've also left a welcome message at your talk page with some helpful tips. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 10:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thanks!

No problem. I'm sure you would do the same :D DARTH PANDAtalk 00:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF

Are you a fucking moron dude? Citing sources? The article itself says that it's a theory, all I said was that there are many theories as to what they actually relate to, that information is highly flawed.

Okay, so can you provide a source to state that? Or is that statement entirely original research on your part? —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 01:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO, the source lies in this"

Andrew H. Gordon and Calvin W. Schwabe speculated that the Ankh, Djed and Was symbols were derived from"

IT SAYS THEY SPECULATED, I shouldn't have to go find a book with some author telling you that NOBODY FUCKING KNOWS WHAT THEY MEAN! AND YOU SHOULDN'T MISLEAD PEOPLE ON WIKIPEDIA BY TELLING what one theory is, and not ANY other single theory.