The Burke Group: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m →Operations: The article was mostly corrections/edits from too many errors in the original post. Better to state only election results similar to the other elections listed |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* '''Silberline''' 12 Nov 2002, ACAS, Employees voted 42 to 27 against union recognition. |
* '''Silberline''' 12 Nov 2002, ACAS, Employees voted 42 to 27 against union recognition. |
||
*'''[[Chinese Daily News]]''', March 2001, In September 2005, Employees voted 92-52 against union recognition. |
|||
*'''[[Chinese Daily News]]''', March 2001, 150 employees (including supervisors which is a violation of the [[NLRA]]) of Monterey Park California (U.S.) voted 78-63 to join the CWA (Communications Workers of America) and its member union, the Newspaper Guild. As a result, The National Labor Relations Board ([[NLRB]]) ruled to overturn the March 2001 election due to "supervisory taint" and ordered a new election. <ref>http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m5072/is_33_27/ai_n15400243, Chinese Daily News workers face second vote on unionization"]</ref> Note: In the U.S. supervisors are not permitted to take part in card signing or be members of the bargaining unit. TBG consultants advised CDN of the [[NLRA]] violations and union recognition was contested. In September 2005, the union lost a rerun of the election 92-52. In a separate unrelated dispute in March 2004, CDN employee and union organizer Lynn Wang filed a class action suit in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California 2007, for Wage and Hour violations governed by the U.S. Dept of Labor. The [[NLRB]] is not part of the U.S. Dept of Labor. TBG is not a law firm and consults only within the confines of the [[NLRA]] which does not govern Wage and Hour disputes. The aforementioned dispute was litigated by law firms unrelated to TBG. In March 2008 CDN lost the case. <ref>http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/01/business/fi-newspaper1, "Paper must pay in wage and hour case"]</ref>. The verdict is currently under appeal in the Ninth District Court of Appeals.<ref>http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=0d59303b3f6f127482b95f7f7c0a4ca7, "Chinese Daily News to Appeal Verdict"]</ref> |
|||
*'''[[Calor Gas]]''', 18 Feb 2003, ACAS, Employees voted 43 to 14 against union recognition. |
*'''[[Calor Gas]]''', 18 Feb 2003, ACAS, Employees voted 43 to 14 against union recognition. |
Revision as of 04:55, 28 September 2008
The Burke Group (TBG Labor for short) is a Malibu based American management consultancy, established in 1982.[1] It is the largest management consultancy for "union avoidance and preventative industrial labor relations."[2] TBG offers advice to employers and services on keeping workplaces "union free",[3] also known as the practice of union busting.
The CEO and President of TBG is David J. Burke. He is a resident of Agoura Hills, California and a regular donor to the US Republican party.[4]
Business
TBG Labor assists employers in making sure that a trade union has serious difficulty in becoming recognised in workplaces, so that collective bargaining cannot take place. According to its website, employees considering a union,
"will demonstrate their conviction to remain union free by exercising their right to vote and by making an "informed" decision. TBG possesses the professional expertise at all levels of a union's organizing efforts (pre-petition, counter campaigning, and post-election) that guarantees that the voting unit will be "informed". [5]
TBG recommends that employers use their management staff to meet workers individually in an attempt to strongly persuade them of the perceived disadvantages of voting to be a part of a union. This may include arguing that a union will decrease pay, that workers could end up on strikes all the time, and that unions would harass them at their homes.[6]
TBG Labor also operates a subsidiary called Labor Information Services specialising in persuading employees to not join a union.[7] According to their webpage, the LIS is necessary because the "recent influx of non English speaking workers (predominantly Hispanic workers) throughout U.S. industries has made communications (third party persuading) to a company’s workforce a major challenge." Their consultants talk can talk to workers in "English, Spanish, Tagalong (sic), French, Portuguese, Vietnamese as well as several dialects of Chinese."
TBG has a strong privacy policy for employers to consult in confidence.[8]
Operations
- Eaton Corporation, July 2000, The union withdrew its bid for recognition.
- Honeywell, 12 October 2001 CAC Ballot, Employees voted 64 to 26 against union recognition.
- Amazon, 12 Sept 2001 ACAS voluntary petition, Employees voted 188 to 35 against union recognition.
- G.E. Calidonia, 29 May 2002, CAC Ballot, Employees voted 449 to 223 against union recognition.
- Silberline 12 Nov 2002, ACAS, Employees voted 42 to 27 against union recognition.
- Chinese Daily News, March 2001, In September 2005, Employees voted 92-52 against union recognition.
- Calor Gas, 18 Feb 2003, ACAS, Employees voted 43 to 14 against union recognition.
- Virgin Air, 21 May 2003, ACAS Employees voted 450 to 99 against union recognition.
- T-mobile, May 2003, ACAS, TBG sent 7 minute videos to 550 employees homes to convince them to not vote for recognition of the Communication Workers Union. T-Mobile employees on 8 May 2003 voted 351 to 170 against union recognition.[9]
- FlyBe, 2006, 400 cabin crew tried to join the union Unite. Two (2) TBG consultants worked for just over 4 weeks. There was no anti-union campaign, and no videos were produced or distributed. FlyBe hired TBG to secure a ballot for good industrial relations: this was accomplished and TBG's services ended. Employees voted 94% (89% turnout) in favour of union recognition.
- Cable & Wireless, August 2007, employed TBG when the Communication Workers Union sought recognition 330 at the Central Arbitration Committee.[10] In June 2008 359 ballots were issued and 331 returned representing a 92% vote turnout whereby the Cable and Wireless employees voted 254 to 77 against union recognition. [11]
- Kettle Chips, With advice from TBG the company persuaded the Central Arbitration Committee to include office workers as part of a larger bargaining unit. TBG argued to workers that there would be a greater threat of strike if the union won. Subsequently 2 Facebook campaigns were launched to boycott Kettle Chips for its involvement with TBG.[12] Kettle then hired PR firm Hill and Knowlton to improve their image.[13] October 2007, Kettle Chips workers voted against union recognition 206 to 93[14].
See also
Template:Companies portal Template:Organized labour portal
- Employee Free Choice Act, proposed American legislation on freedom to form unions
- Freedom of association
- Labour law
- Employment Relations Act 1999
- Landrum Griffith Act (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act)
- National Labor Relations Act
- Taft-Hartley Act
- Railway Labor Act
Notes
- ^ This should not be confused with the Canadian temporary worker and human resources recruitment agency by the same name, est. 1979. For the Canadian firm, see The Burke Group's website.
- ^ The Burke Group Labor Relations Consultation to Management website
- ^ TBG Labor website, outlining its union free strategies
- ^ see, the Huffington Post 'Fundrace 2008' website; see CampaignMoney.com's search for David Burke, for 2004 and 2006
- ^ see, TBG Labor's FAQ on union avoidance, [1]
- ^ Logan, U.S. Anti-Union Consultants: A Threat to the Rights of British Workers (2008) pp.6
- ^ See the Labor Information Services website
- ^ see, TBG Labor's privacy policy webpage
- ^ BBC News, Unions attack mobile phone firm, June 2, 2003
- ^ C&W's 'union busters' spark fury, The Independent, 19 August 2007
- ^ http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2008/06/24/46442/cwu-fails-to-win-recognition-bid-at-cable-wireless.html "CWU Fails to Win Recognition bid at Cable & Wireless"]
- ^ see, Boycott Kettle Chips: the anti-Trade Union snack and boycott kettle crisps for attacks on workers on Facebook
- ^ David Hencke, 'Has Kettle had its chips?', The Guardian
- ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/oct/13/uk.tradeunions "Workers at Kettle Foods vote against joining union"]
References
- John Logan, U.S. Anti-Union Consultants: A Threat to the Rights of British Workers, report for the Trades Union Congress on union busting (2008)
External links
- Union avoidance/busting firms
- The Burke Group's "labor relations and consultant to management" website
- Labor Information Services
- PTI Labor Research website
- News reports involving TBG Labor
- Stephen Overell, 'Consultants do battle with the brotherhoods', Financial Times, Monday April 26, 2004
- Personnel Today article, Manufacturers' body EEF denies use of 'union-busting' consultants in UK (19.2.2008)
- Vince Beiser, Legal Unionbusters, February 25, 2007
- Andrew Taylor, TUC acts to thwart US ‘union busters’, Financial Times, February 12, 2008
- David Hencke, 'Workers at Kettle Foods Vote Against Joining Union' "The Guardian", 13 October 2007
- Laura Smith, Union-busting tactics on the increase, warns TUC, The Guardian, 12 February 2008
- Jon Henley and Ed Pilkington, 'Divide and Rule', The Guardian, Tuesday February 26 2008
- Nick Kochan, 'Alarm over tactics of 'union-busting' firm', The Observer, Sunday April 6 2008
- Steve Farrar, 'Americans Move in to stop unions', The Times, Sunday May 4 2008
- Mike Berry, "CWU Fails to Win Recognition Bid at Cable and Wireless: Personnel Today, 24 June 2008
- CWU Snubbed at Cable & Wireless, 'The Communication Workers Union (CWU) has been snubbed by employees at Cable & Wireless' 25 June 2008
- CAC Amends its Judgment About The Burke Group [Category:Labour law], London School of Economics Daily Headlines 25/07/08 IT News, Italy [2]
- Richard Tyler, "Union-recognition Dispute Ruling Altered after Consultants Complain", The Daily Telegraph, Aug. 3, 2008
- Legal Brief Today, 'Court Amends Judgment over Unfair Criticism', Aug. 5, 2008