Talk:Pirates (2005 film): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 71.79.81.4 - "→SPOILERS!: " |
No edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
pirates xxx was not the most expensive pornographic film ever produced, caligula was. SOMEONE FIX THIS <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.79.81.4|71.79.81.4]] ([[User talk:71.79.81.4|talk]]) 04:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
pirates xxx was not the most expensive pornographic film ever produced, caligula was. SOMEONE FIX THIS <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.79.81.4|71.79.81.4]] ([[User talk:71.79.81.4|talk]]) 04:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Pirates II == |
|||
The DVD is now out for Pirates II there is a WP entry for it, but it's a stub. Needs someone to flesh it out [[Pirates_II:_Stagnetti's_Revenge]][[User:Gkleinman|Gkleinman]] ([[User talk:Gkleinman|talk]]) |
Revision as of 19:26, 8 October 2008
Film Start‑class | |||||||
|
Pornography Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Spam. Inappropriate material for Wikipedia. I come for research, not for porn ads.
- Agree, so I change the redirects of pirates to pirate (ie: the sea pirate) instead. In addition, the writeups for the article seems like an advertisement. Hopefully, it will be re-written. Otherwise, it may be WP:AfD candidates. --Hurricane111 20:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
There are plenty of pornographic films and pornography-related material in Wikipedia. Indeed, another pornographic parody, this time of Brokeback Mountain (film), has its article at Bareback Mountain. If you wish to be learn more about Wikipedia and pornography, please go to Wikipedia:Pornography. Thank you so much. --Cumbiagermen 10:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Some folks do come to Wikipedia to research porn. And, in a way, by the original commenter's way of thinking, every movie article here could be considered spam/ads. Dr Archeville 15:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
de-stubbing?
I really don't see how this article is a stub any more. Anyone agree or disagree? If I don't hear from anyone in 7 days, I'll de-stub it myself. --Mr Vain 07:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Meh, I'm removing it. I'm not patient enough to wait that long and the last posting in this talk was done months ago. --Mr Vain 00:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Add video excerpts
I think we should put the beta audio-visual system through it's paces and have video excerpts from the film.
- lol
possibly crude terminology?
"everybody bangs."? That doesn't seem an appropriate way to put it for an encyclopedia, though I am unsure how to rephase it.
SPOILERS!
Oh man, this article needs a spoiler warning. It totally ruined the movie for me. :( 69.143.153.160 01:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- SPOILERS: There's boobies. 71.228.242.245 (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Lies in the opening paragraph
pirates xxx was not the most expensive pornographic film ever produced, caligula was. SOMEONE FIX THIS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.81.4 (talk) 04:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Pirates II
The DVD is now out for Pirates II there is a WP entry for it, but it's a stub. Needs someone to flesh it out Pirates_II:_Stagnetti's_RevengeGkleinman (talk)