Talk:Snowballing (sexual practice): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:14, 10 October 2008

	Erotica and pornography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 May 2006. The result of the discussion was KEEP.

Thank God this is a stub article. Let us hope it remains one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2toise (talk • contribs)

Amen! Auric The Rad 15:13, Dec 7, 2003 (UTC)

Is this truly a paraphila, or merely a sexual practice? -- The Anome 01:06, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thank God it's been expanded. Wikipedia shouldn't self-censor to the extent that sexual information is unavailable. Taking the mystery out of sexual practices and educating people in a straightforward way can hardly be argued to be a bad thing. As long as an article remains to have a neutral point of view, presents factual information, and does both of these thing in an encyclopedic way, I'll support ANY article. --ABQCat 23:25, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I think the external like should be removed, because it has pure entertaintment character. The description in the article is better, because it is more distanced. Davoud — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.240.113.194 (talk • contribs)

I can agree with this statement, if another link could be found which shows the practice to not be simply encyclopaedic and to have some distinction in the sexual/pop-culture world. --ABQCat 21:10, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I hope that wikipedia moderators will act in accordance to their rules and ignore these puritan bigots that are here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlel (talk • contribs)

Yes, undoubtedly, when the day comes when someone can be judged for enjoying sucking sperm out of another person's anus with a straw it will be a very sorry day. i think. j1moris2yahoo.com

You do realise that's Feltching don't you?!?! (82.4.63.69 00:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Image

I have added an image to this article. It is an image of my own creation and released to the public domain. If you would like to make suggestions for an alternate image, or request an image for another article, please see my user page. Thanks. --SeedFeeder (talk) 08:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dominant roles?

There are a couple of references to dominant roles in this article which, I think, should either have citations or be removed.

I mean why does felatio specifically "not entail" the male being passive? I can't see why it should be seen as a practice where the male is always dominant, that seems quite a subjective statement to me. Jim —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.102.176 (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, as there have been no objections, I've gone ahead and taken out the worst bit. Jim Jay (talk) 16:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:01, 5 October 2008 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,550,915 edits m Signing comment by 82.21.102.176 - "dominant roles?" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:14, 10 October 2008 edit undo Jim Jay (talk \| contribs) 28 edits →‎Dominant roles? Next edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I mean why does felatio specifically "not entail" the male being passive? I can't see why it should be seen as a practice where the male is always dominant, that seems quite a subjective statement to me. Jim <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.21.102.176\|82.21.102.176]] ([[User talk:82.21.102.176\|talk]]) 00:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		I mean why does felatio specifically "not entail" the male being passive? I can't see why it should be seen as a practice where the male is always dominant, that seems quite a subjective statement to me. Jim <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.21.102.176\|82.21.102.176]] ([[User talk:82.21.102.176\|talk]]) 00:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			OK, as there have been no objections, I've gone ahead and taken out the worst bit. [[User:Jim Jay\|Jim Jay]] ([[User talk:Jim Jay\|talk]]) 16:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)