Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Covadonga: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
how come the asturians won when it lost 289 out of 300 of its troop?
how come the asturians won when it lost 289 out of 300 of its troop?


It seems victory is conceded to the asturians due to the fact that both Alqama and Munuza were killed and their forces (rather superior) were decimated. Victory may also be conceded due to the fact that muslim forces never again challenged the Kingdom of Asturias (possibly because it was not worth the trouble) and because the battle is considered to be the starting point of the Reconquista, an ongoing effort that eight centuries later ended muslim rule in the peninsula. Also, Pelayo survived, adding to his charisma.[[User:Cptn. Nemo|Cptn. Nemo]] 18:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems victory is conceded to the asturians due to the fact that both Alqama and Munuza were killed and their forces (rather superior) were decimated. Victory may also be conceded due to the fact that muslim forces never again challenged the Kingdom of Asturias (possibly because it was not worth the trouble) and because the battle is considered to be the starting point of the Reconquista, an ongoing effort that eight centuries later ended muslim rule in the peninsula. Also, Pelayo survived, adding to his charisma.[[User:Cptn. Nemo|Cptn. Nemo]] 18:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)--[[User:Cptn. Nemo|Cptn. Nemo]] ([[User talk:Cptn. Nemo|talk]]) 19:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


==Decisive victory?==
==Decisive victory?==

Revision as of 19:05, 13 October 2008

WikiProject iconSpain Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPortugal Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

  • Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
  • Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

Assess

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

WikiProject iconMilitary history: European / Spanish / Medieval Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
Spanish military history task force
Taskforce icon
Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Question

how come the asturians won when it lost 289 out of 300 of its troop?

It seems victory is conceded to the asturians due to the fact that both Alqama and Munuza were killed and their forces (rather superior) were decimated. Victory may also be conceded due to the fact that muslim forces never again challenged the Kingdom of Asturias (possibly because it was not worth the trouble) and because the battle is considered to be the starting point of the Reconquista, an ongoing effort that eight centuries later ended muslim rule in the peninsula. Also, Pelayo survived, adding to his charisma.Cptn. Nemo 18:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)--Cptn. Nemo (talk) 19:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decisive victory?

The infobox labels this a "decisive" victory for Asturias.

Victory, sure, since it won the kingdom its independence. But how is having only eleven men survive decisive?


Well its decive because if they had lost then the asturian kingdom would be conquered by the moors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.100.246 (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historically, as understood by christians, spaniards, and specially asturians, the battle signifies the beginning of the Reconquista (won't find many historians that would disagree either). The Reconquista took centuries to force invaders out of the penninsula and its mommentum united Castille and Aragon into a force that would bent, blend, blast, shatter and melt cultures all over the globe for centuries and forever, all for good and for bad and mostly for both.

That is the significance (mostly accepted) of whatever happened in those mountains. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cptn. Nemo (talkcontribs) 18:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]