Talk:Afon Clun: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:38, 15 October 2008

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Rivers C‑class Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Afon Clun appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 October 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/October.

Wikipedia

This page is horrible. That "FACT" is basically mentioned as a passing event in the form of one sentence (muddled in the middle of a non-relevant paragraph). Instead this article is loaded with a bunch of lame 'boundry' quotes on the definitions of water quality and definitions of factories. This article looks like it took a beautiful river and made it as mundane and boring as possible. Boo! 75.56.194.13 (talk) 19:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:35, 15 October 2008 edit 75.56.194.13 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:38, 15 October 2008 edit undo 75.56.194.13 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	{{dyktalk\|15 October\|2008}}		{{dyktalk\|15 October\|2008}}

	This page is horrible. That "FACT" is ~~not even~~ mentioned in this article, ~~which~~ ~~instead~~ ~~has~~ a bunch of lame 'boundry' quotes on the definitions of water quality. This article looks like it took a beautiful river and made it as mundane and boring as possible. Boo! [[Special:Contributions/75.56.194.13\|75.56.194.13]] ([[User talk:75.56.194.13\|talk]]) 19:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)		This page is horrible. That "FACT" is basically mentioned as a passing event in the form of one sentence (muddled in the middle of a non-relevant paragraph). Instead this article is loaded with a bunch of lame 'boundry' quotes on the definitions of water quality and definitions of factories. This article looks like it took a beautiful river and made it as mundane and boring as possible. Boo! [[Special:Contributions/75.56.194.13\|75.56.194.13]] ([[User talk:75.56.194.13\|talk]]) 19:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)