User talk:Geniusdream: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:44, 29 October 2008

This is the discussion page of Genius Dream, feel free to put comments or messages regarding me as a user here in Wikipedia, so that I can work on it as soon as possible. --Geniusdream (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Efe (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can delete immediately all of the images that have no references, because I really don't know how to delete and provide references for it.

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced by the exchange below that you're aware what you've done is wrong. Your block is temporary - it expires on Sunday - so I suggest taking this time to familiarise yourself with the policies about image uploads. — Fritzpoll (talk) 18:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you read and understood Wikipedia:Image use policy, particularly with regards to fair use considerations? Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Not yet, I'm just a new user, and I really can't grasp everything about it, so I just upload pictures just like with other sites. You can delete those images immediately, then I'll be reading Wikipedia:Image use policy and upload pictures properly next time. --Geniusdream (talk) 07:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well that really didn't make sense for me at all. It means that an admin will just unblock you, when you don't know the reason & will possibly continue to upload copyright violations? I really suggest you check WP:IUP & try again. --Kanonkas : Talk 14:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just reverting the article Sarah Geronimo to the version which has the references, compared to the version that other users keep on putting there, which has no references. Furthermore, the user Wynchard Bloom (talk) keeps on vandalizing my userpage as well as my discussion page, putting personal attacks on it and warnings that are indefinite.

Decline reason:

Whatver issue you have with Wychcard personally: You continued to push your changes into Sarah Geronimo after I advised you above not to do so and fake block notices[1] don't help your case either. — Tikiwont (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit it, I engaged myself to an edit war, but I just want to make the article better and more comprehensive. Look at the current version of Sarah Geronimo, the references was reduced compared to the version I reverted. And furthermore, regarding the long introduction, as I have read on one of the guidelines here in wikipedia, it is said that putting information is unlimited as long as it has sources and moreover, the introduction was generalized rather than very detailed.

Decline reason:

You still haven't said anything about the image copyright violation issue; also, even if you were editing with good intentions, you still breached 3RR. Also, as others have pointed out, some of your conduct is uncalled for (such as the fake blocks). — Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 14:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Regarding the images I've uploaded, I'm really not familiar about license or sources for the photos, I was trying to delete those but I can't. Then, the issue about 3RR, I admit that act but I really wanted to put it back to the version which has better references. And the fake blocks, the template I gave was supposed to be a warning, I've mistaken.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Regarding the images I've uploaded, I'm really not familiar about license or sources for the photos, I was trying to delete those but I can't. Then, the issue about 3RR, I admit that act but I really wanted to put it back to the version which has better references. And the fake blocks, the template I gave was supposed to be a warning, I've mistaken.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Regarding the images I've uploaded, I'm really not familiar about license or sources for the photos, I was trying to delete those but I can't. Then, the issue about 3RR, I admit that act but I really wanted to put it back to the version which has better references. And the fake blocks, the template I gave was supposed to be a warning, I've mistaken.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Regarding the images I've uploaded, I'm really not familiar about license or sources for the photos, I was trying to delete those but I can't. Then, the issue about 3RR, I admit that act but I really wanted to put it back to the version which has better references. And the fake blocks, the template I gave was supposed to be a warning, I've mistaken.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Revision as of 14:41, 29 October 2008 edit Master of Puppets (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 28,455 edits don't spam unblocks please. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:44, 29 October 2008 edit undo Geniusdream (talk \| contribs) 638 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	{{unblock reviewed\|1=I admit it, I engaged myself to an edit war, but I just want to make the article better and more comprehensive. Look at the current version of [[Sarah Geronimo]], the references was reduced compared to the version I reverted. And furthermore, regarding the long introduction, as I have read on one of the guidelines here in wikipedia, it is said that putting information is unlimited as long as it has sources and moreover, the introduction was generalized rather than very detailed.\|decline=You still haven't said anything about the image copyright violation issue; also, even if you were editing with good intentions, you still breached 3RR. Also, as others have pointed out, some of your conduct is uncalled for (such as the fake blocks). — [[User:Master of Puppets\|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets\|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 14:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|1=I admit it, I engaged myself to an edit war, but I just want to make the article better and more comprehensive. Look at the current version of [[Sarah Geronimo]], the references was reduced compared to the version I reverted. And furthermore, regarding the long introduction, as I have read on one of the guidelines here in wikipedia, it is said that putting information is unlimited as long as it has sources and moreover, the introduction was generalized rather than very detailed.\|decline=You still haven't said anything about the image copyright violation issue; also, even if you were editing with good intentions, you still breached 3RR. Also, as others have pointed out, some of your conduct is uncalled for (such as the fake blocks). — [[User:Master of Puppets\|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets\|<sub style="color:#7d7d7d">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 14:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock\| Regarding the images I've uploaded, I'm really not familiar about license or sources for the photos, I was trying to delete those but I can't. Then, the issue about 3RR, I admit that act but I really wanted to put it back to the version which has better references. And the fake blocks, the template I gave was supposed to be a warning, I've mistaken. }}