Talk:FoxyTunes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:51, 30 November 2008

Unix/Linux

Most of the 'unix' players listed are primarily used on linux, surely this section should be altered to "linux" or "unix/linux"

92.237.136.171 (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)jonny_bouu27[reply]

I don't know much about it, but if you think so, then be bold and go ahead and change it. --Mike | Contrib 02:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review List

I don't know whether this would be a good idea, but maybe in the External Links there should be a link to a list of review sites generated by Google? Something like this? Or mabey replace Yahoo! with Google?

External links (Example)

Google list of FoxyTunes Reviews

Webdog1000 01:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I got a pop up from foxytunes...believe it.15 mins ago ADWARE?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.88.236.62 (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement? Neutrality in question...

This article reads like an ad: features are listed, but no criticism, bugs, public reception, etc. This article reads like it was written by a sock-puppet. It's all pros, no cons. I'm nominating it non-NPOV. Durty Willy 16:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see this article as biased. Perhaps the author simply wasn't aware of any criticism, bugs, public reception, etc.

Since you take issue with this article as written, I'd suggest you be bold. --angrykeyboarder (a/k/a:Scott) (talk) 01:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/92.237.136.171|92.237.136.171]] ([[User talk:92.237.136.171|talk]]) 17:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)jonny_bouu27
+:I don't know much about it, but if you think so, then [[Wikipedia:Be_bold|be bold]] and go ahead and change it. --[[User:Mikekearn|Mike]] | [[Special:Contributions/Mikekearn|Contrib]] 02:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 ==Review List==