User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:50, 2 December 2008

8:35 am, 9 October 2024 (PDT)

Important: This talk page is becoming very boring. Please consider leaving hilarious knock-knock jokes so as to spruce things up a little. Thanks!

Wikipedia:Don't Feed the Divas

For I have learned to look on nature, not as in the hour of thoughtless youth, but hearing oftentimes the still, sad music of humanity.

vn-92

This user talk page has been vandalized 92 times.

Wikimood

[purge]	[edit]

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Blocked from editing

Hi. You have blocked me from editing, because you say I violated the 3-revert rule on the article: Čelebići prison camp. However, according to the Three-revert rule, "Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period". But I have only reverted once and was immediately blocked. I can only assume you counted my previous reverts before I was engaged in an edit-war. Then I can understand...however..

You have blocked for more than a period of 24 hours. I was blocked on Thursday, November 13 and my block is set to expire on Saturday, November 15 at 21:14. That is more than 48 hours.

Also, the user I am in an edit-war with is Kruško Mortale. Now he has repeatedly reverted edits for no reason and has not been blocked from editing. Please look into it and I ask you that you be fair. Thanks.

-Dfener91 (talk)

RfA thanks

		The RfA Barnstar
		Tiptoety, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to Stwalkerster and Pedro for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ANI and AN to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the non-free content criteria and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply ask at my talk page and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) The Helpful One 22:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eugene Police Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Eugene Police Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Tiptoety ^talk 17:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y HALLO THAR

Welcome back :) // roux editor review17:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Oh, why thank you. (I will have your answer for you within the next few days) :) Tiptoety ^talk 17:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and no rush. I see you're on IRC.. I'll say hi there. // roux editor review17:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IIPM

This is regarding the page IIPM whose protection you removed. I don't know if you have been following the page for long, so just a few points FYI. The major point that the white-washers are working on is getting the Controversy section deleted, even though it is properly cited with valid references from major indian and foreign newspapers. They also want any other negatives deleted. And a lot of the fawning stuff they add about IIPM is either with cites to their own website, or then random press releases put out by the school that appear not in newspapers, but in press-release-collection websites. The whole purpose is to purge any negative mention of IIPM in google searches, and since wikipedia has a high google rank, they keep doing so. If you want to be convinced of IIPM's ceaseless whitewashing strategy above and beyond just wikipedia, go to http://blogsearch.google.com and enter IIPM. See how many splogs (spam blogs) pop up. And these splogs are created every hour or so, as you can see. No amount of semi-protection or even short term protection will work. The people whom I suspect to be IIPM employees, will just go back to creating spam blogs, and whenever the protection is lifted, return to wiki and start whitewashing again.
The only thing that can work, with such a concerted whitewash campaign, is a long term (if not indefinite) editlock, with changes to the page being made only after consensus on the talk page. You may choose to not put an indefinite editlock, and that's your opinion. But just thought I'd let you know about the context. Makrandjoshi (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Down, Zero Interest at the Oregon COTW

Hello to all the WikiProject Oregon folks, time once again for yet another bone chilling edition of the Collaboration Of The Week. I thank yee who helped make improvements to Fort Stevens and Upper Klamath Lake. For this first week of December, we have by request Mike Bellotti and his archrival Mike Riley, both in honor of that great tradition we call the Civil War (AKA the battle for the platypus). As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. This message is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents is strictly prohibited. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Account Creator

Thanks for the notification. While I understand that this is routine housekeeping, do you have a link to the discussion thread? Geoff Plourde (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My response can be found here Tiptoety ^talk 19:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frogger3140

[1] That idiot created a mess with user talk pages. I just found one which was basically vandalism. 96.232.11.55 (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
 Thanks for the notification. While I understand that this is routine housekeeping, do you have a link to the discussion thread? [[User:Geoff Plourde|Geoff Plourde]] ([[User talk:Geoff Plourde|talk]]) 16:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 :''My response can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Geoff_Plourde&diff=255478157&oldid=255414991 here] [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 19:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)''
+== Frogger3140 ==
+[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Frogger3140] That idiot created a mess with user talk pages. I just found one which was basically vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/96.232.11.55|96.232.11.55]] ([[User talk:96.232.11.55|talk]]) 21:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)