Pars pro toto: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Remove part about some people ‘maybe’ feeling excluded when referring to the Netherlands as Holland |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*The use of capitals to denote capital regions or even entire countries, e.g. “[[Canberra]]” for the [[Australian Capital Territory]] |
*The use of capitals to denote capital regions or even entire countries, e.g. “[[Canberra]]” for the [[Australian Capital Territory]] |
||
Such usage can cause offense. The people of [[Scotland]] and [[Wales]], for example, would not want to be referred to as part of “England” or as “English” |
Such usage can cause offense. The people of [[Scotland]] and [[Wales]], for example, would not want to be referred to as part of “England” or as “English”. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
Revision as of 22:42, 2 December 2008
Pars pro toto is Latin for "(taking) a part for the whole" where a portion of an object or concept represents the entire object or context. See also synecdoche.
When used in a context of language it means that something is named after a part of it, or after a limited characteristic, in itself not necessarily representative for the whole. For example, "glasses" is a pars pro toto name for something that consists of more than just two pieces of glass.
Pars pro toto is a common device in iconography, where a particular icon can stand for a complete set of characteristics.
The opposite of a pars pro toto is a totum pro parte, in which the whole is used to describe a part.
In geography
Certain place names are sometimes used to denote an area greater than that warranted by their strict meaning. Examples of this include:
- “England” for Great Britain, the British Isles and/or the United Kingdom – see British Isles (terminology)
- “Holland” for the Netherlands – see Netherlands (terminology)
- “Persia” for Iran – see Iran naming dispute
- “Russia” for the former Soviet Union
- The use of capitals to denote capital regions or even entire countries, e.g. “Canberra” for the Australian Capital Territory
Such usage can cause offense. The people of Scotland and Wales, for example, would not want to be referred to as part of “England” or as “English”.