User talk:Hollywoodnorthreport

Synthetic Entertainment

A tag has been placed on Synthetic Entertainment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Socrates2008 (Talk) 13:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Synthetic Entertainment

I have nominated Synthetic Entertainment, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthetic Entertainment. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --VS ^talk 02:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Synthetic Entertainment

• Thanks for your message. Good to see you taking such a keen interest. As you probably know I was only flagging these pages as part of a procedural nomination following the request to speedy delete the first by another editor. I would rather remain at arms distance at the moment - mainly because as an administrator trawling through hundreds of 'duties' I just don't have the time to be able to re-write each article. That said the AfD should stay there for its 5 day nominated time-slot but you should rest assured that other editors will see your work and nominate keep, delete or merge as a result of the changed pages - and in many cases take a moment to adjust the 'rough edges' you speak of. Again well done on your work. Cheers!--VS ^talk 05:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Recovery
		Whilst I do not know if you will save the article/s as yet - it is very refreshing to see an editor taking positive steps to edit towards recovery when articles in their field of immediate interest are listed at AfD. Congratulations and keep up the good work! --VS talk 07:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

External map service links

Hello. You have been identified as having added or removed direct external map service links in articles[1]. There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:External links#Issues with inclusion or exclusion of map service links about which should be done, and some more opinions would be good to find community consensus. --Para (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LSD smaller.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:LSD smaller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 02:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Spamming hollywoodnorthreport.com and Synthetic Entertainment

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spamicide (talk) 23:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Spamicide (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

excuse me? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Hollywoodnorthreport (talk)

• What do you mean who am I to threaten you? Are you unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies on external links and spam? Or Conflict of interest? Spamicide (talk) 12:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

• • you come out of nowhere....with an obvious agenda.....where is your history on WIKI? or let me guess this is a sock puppet account? as you sure know your way around wiki. I am obviously not who you say I am....so why don't you leave it alone? I looked at your edits to the pages in questions and reworked some of your changes as some of your comments were valid, the cyberpunk music, etc. And all you have is one thing on your mind....... Hollywoodnorthreport (talk)

• I fail to see how my identity is relevant to your abuse of Wikipedia. However, yes, this is an alternative account. Unfortunately, some spammers can be very vindictive. Because my main account gives clues as to my real identity, it is possible for an upset spammer to retaliate. This happened to me recently, and now I have created this account, which I will keep for dealing with "trouble." I do not participate in any discussions, conflicts, or edits with more than one account. After all, I am trying to fight abuse - that would completely undermine my efforts ;) Spamicide (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

wow talk about the most convenient excuse ever ;) this is personal and you know it....against LEFT SPINE DOWN it seems like. I'm not in the band nor do I work for them. I bet your in a rival band or something along those lines. Who cares thats not about me.... I think the pages in question are fine now....like I said I took some of your edits and reworked my earlier work/other peoples on the pages. Now please can you leave me alone? The vandalism report you put in was closed so please lets end this here. I have better things to do. Hollywoodnorthreport (talk)

also do you mind you calling me a SPAMMMMER every time you can. If you look at my work on wiki most of it is not relating to Vancouver Music or bands, etc.......so how can I be this Vancouver music spamer as you make me out to be? Please leave me alone.Hollywoodnorthreport (talk)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)