User talk:Bonewah: Difference between revisions
Amwestover (talk | contribs) |
Amwestover (talk | contribs) →2004 election controversies: new section |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Hey Bonewah, just wanted to let you know that real life is getting in the way of Wikilife at the moment, so I won't be able to get back to you as soon as I'd originally hoped. I just wanted to drop you a quick message so you'd know that I'm not leaving you hanging. --[[User:Amwestover|Amwestover]] ([[User_talk:Amwestover|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Amwestover|contrib]]) 21:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC) |
:Hey Bonewah, just wanted to let you know that real life is getting in the way of Wikilife at the moment, so I won't be able to get back to you as soon as I'd originally hoped. I just wanted to drop you a quick message so you'd know that I'm not leaving you hanging. --[[User:Amwestover|Amwestover]] ([[User_talk:Amwestover|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Amwestover|contrib]]) 21:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Hello again, sorry that I took so long to get back to you, but things were really hectic the past few weeks. I was able to find time tonight to go through the article and fix problem areas. Here's the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies&diff=259462209&oldid=259388602 diff] of my changes. A lot of it was actually just cleanup. The most significant change was that a lot of the racial discrimination section was removed. I felt that a lot of it was supported by non-neutral opinion sources, in particular I thought that RFK Jr. wasn't qualified to make the statements that he did, and dead link sources. I think that article is now at a point where the tag can be removed so I deleted it myself.<br>I'd like to thank you again for putting in the effort to help present the article in a neutral manner. --[[User:Amwestover|Amwestover]] ([[User_talk:Amwestover|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Amwestover|contrib]]) 03:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC) |
::Hello again, sorry that I took so long to get back to you, but things were really hectic the past few weeks. I was able to find time tonight to go through the article and fix problem areas. Here's the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies&diff=259462209&oldid=259388602 diff] of my changes. A lot of it was actually just cleanup. The most significant change was that a lot of the racial discrimination section was removed. I felt that a lot of it was supported by non-neutral opinion sources, in particular I thought that RFK Jr. wasn't qualified to make the statements that he did, and dead link sources. I think that article is now at a point where the tag can be removed so I deleted it myself.<br>I'd like to thank you again for putting in the effort to help present the article in a neutral manner. --[[User:Amwestover|Amwestover]] ([[User_talk:Amwestover|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Amwestover|contrib]]) 03:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
== 2004 election controversies == |
|||
Hey, just leaving you a quick message that I presented an alternate version to my edit on the [[2004 United States election voting controversies]] and elaborated on its purpose on the talk page. Thought you'd like to take a look. --<font face="Arial Black">[[User:Amwestover|''Amwestover'']] ([[User_talk:Amwestover|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Amwestover|contrib]])</font> 04:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:53, 30 December 2008
Welcome!
|
Useful Wiki links
Wikipedia:Dead external links/404/misc
wikipedia:Requests for comment
Pages that link to "Template:Advert"
Re: POV flag on 2004 election controversies
Hello Bonewah, thanks for alerting me of the changes that you made on 2004 United States election voting controversies. You made a lot of constructive edits, but I believe there is still work that needs to be done. I unfortunately didn't specify exactly where in my original talk page comment where I thought there were neutrality problems, but based on a quick skimming comparing the version I applied the tag to and the current version, I still see some instances where there may be original research and where there may be some undue weight. I'll take a closer look at the article in the next few days and give you some more details on where I think some issue should be addressed, but overall you've done some good work here. Thanks! --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 22:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hey Bonewah, just wanted to let you know that real life is getting in the way of Wikilife at the moment, so I won't be able to get back to you as soon as I'd originally hoped. I just wanted to drop you a quick message so you'd know that I'm not leaving you hanging. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 21:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hello again, sorry that I took so long to get back to you, but things were really hectic the past few weeks. I was able to find time tonight to go through the article and fix problem areas. Here's the diff of my changes. A lot of it was actually just cleanup. The most significant change was that a lot of the racial discrimination section was removed. I felt that a lot of it was supported by non-neutral opinion sources, in particular I thought that RFK Jr. wasn't qualified to make the statements that he did, and dead link sources. I think that article is now at a point where the tag can be removed so I deleted it myself.
I'd like to thank you again for putting in the effort to help present the article in a neutral manner. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 03:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hello again, sorry that I took so long to get back to you, but things were really hectic the past few weeks. I was able to find time tonight to go through the article and fix problem areas. Here's the diff of my changes. A lot of it was actually just cleanup. The most significant change was that a lot of the racial discrimination section was removed. I felt that a lot of it was supported by non-neutral opinion sources, in particular I thought that RFK Jr. wasn't qualified to make the statements that he did, and dead link sources. I think that article is now at a point where the tag can be removed so I deleted it myself.
2004 election controversies
Hey, just leaving you a quick message that I presented an alternate version to my edit on the 2004 United States election voting controversies and elaborated on its purpose on the talk page. Thought you'd like to take a look. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 04:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)