User talk:Stephen Turner: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Signpost delivery |
archive |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Old discussions: [[/archive1|Nov 2004 – Jun 2005]], [[/archive2|Jul – Aug 2005]], [[/archive3|Sep – Nov 2005]], [[/archive4|Dec 2005]], [[/archive5|Jan – Feb 2006]], [[/archive6|Mar – Apr 2006]], [[/archive7|May – Aug 2006]], [[/archive8|Sep – Dec 2006]], [[/archive9|all 2007]] |
Old discussions: [[/archive1|Nov 2004 – Jun 2005]], [[/archive2|Jul – Aug 2005]], [[/archive3|Sep – Nov 2005]], [[/archive4|Dec 2005]], [[/archive5|Jan – Feb 2006]], [[/archive6|Mar – Apr 2006]], [[/archive7|May – Aug 2006]], [[/archive8|Sep – Dec 2006]], [[/archive9|all 2007]], [[/archive10|all 2008]] |
||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
== CQ == |
|||
Done. Sorry for the delay. [[User_talk:Tintin1107|Tintin]] 13:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Bollyline]] == |
|||
Would really like some consensus but the WikiProject seems to be on holiday en-masse. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 14:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Miller == |
|||
Are you referring to his war record or AFL? --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 11:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Adam Gilchrist == |
|||
Sorry about the first undo it was actually a slip, however his retirement info does belong in the intro paragraph, as he is known as a cricketer his major career news should be listed in Intro. [[User:Erick880|Erick880]] ([[User talk:Erick880|talk]]) 08:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:You didn't read the changes. The retirement info is still in the lead, even more prominent than where you originally put it. The thing I said should be in the article rather than in the lead was the Australian wicket-keeping record when he also holds the world record. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 08:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Stephen, I actually did not use rollback ;) thanks though, I understand your point, and between 3 people we now have a very nice version. |
|||
I would appreciate if you maybe put a little note on my user page noting that I did not use rollback. [[User:Erick880|Erick880]] ([[User talk:Erick880|talk]]) 09:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Done. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 09:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Bob Taylor == |
|||
I think this was your article. It contained an error regarding Taylor's appearence in 1971. He was given a game, as was often the case, against NZ, having spent the tour playing in the up country games whilst Knott was the clear No.1 for the tests. |
|||
The 97 was made at Adelaide and Taylor was not night watchman (1978-9 tour). See scorecard on cricketarchive.[[User:JimBakken|JimBakken]] ([[User talk:JimBakken|talk]]) 20:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Amendment. == |
|||
I have amended small errors and a couple of little grammatical errors on a couple of your articles.[[User:JimBakken|JimBakken]] ([[User talk:JimBakken|talk]]) 20:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Cambridge Nobel Laureates== |
|||
Stephen, I'm pretty new to Wiki, so I hope this is the right place to discuss an article with you! Concerning the Cambridge article in which you reverted one of my changes, specifically the number of Nobel laureates affiliated with Cambridge, I found conflicting information from multiple sources. I, hopefully, explained this on the Discussion page for that article. Any thoughts? I changed the article to say Columbia was the world leader in Nobel laureate affiliates, because that is what the Wikipedia article on that topic states. [[User:Ian Glenn|Ian Glenn]] ([[User talk:Ian Glenn|talk]]) 22:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Red Links == |
|||
Thanks for pointing me in the correct direction [[User:Sanjiv swarup|Sanjiv swarup]] ([[User talk:Sanjiv swarup|talk]]) 10:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Ellyse Perry == |
|||
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] |
|||
|On [[20 February]], [[2008]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} '''''[[Ellyse Perry]]'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{4}}}]]''''' |
|||
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]''''' |
|||
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|||
|} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 20:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Trainspotting Trivia == |
|||
It had to be done. "XXX in fiction" is bad enough, I would love to see the back of those sections, but "XXX in trainspotting" is taking it too far. Sometimes I can't believe some editors... <span style="font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">[[User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<font color="red">'''The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick'''</font>]]<sup> [[User talk:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick|<font color="blue">'''t'''</font>]]</sup></span> 15:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Well done for re-removing. [[User:Doctor Boogaloo|Doctor Boogaloo]] ([[User talk:Doctor Boogaloo|talk]]) 13:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Hello, I posted this in a discussion in Doctor Boogaloo's Talk as well. Perhaps we could continue there if you want to keep the discussion focussed? Anyway for now, this is what I have said - The relevance of the Southern Railway School's class goes beyond that of the 'trainspotter'. This factual entry is one that adds historical context to the entries of the school by the very fact that they were chosen at all. The schools were also consulted on the naming and therefore it was of importance to them. A number of the school's maintain certain vestiges of this episode, such as nameplates of the engines etc which further indicates the importance to the school. Also, by removing the entry altogether, with no attempt to integrate it elsewhere, reduces the possibility that someone will come across this fact at all and thus diminishes to an extent one of the aims of wikipedia and indeed encyclopaedias, to spread knowledge. One of the pleasures of reading any entry is tripping over other facts that point the reader in the direction of topics they otherwise would not have thought to explore. This applies to an encyclopaedia whether paper based or not. But it is perhaps even more pertinent in a non-paper based encyclopaedia such as wikipedia because jumping from topic to topic is so much easier and accessible. Granted, some people would not care to explore the topic of the school's class any further, but some would. Also, whilst some readers would not consider the naming of locomotives after the school an indication of their standing in the public perception at the time, others would and I would prefer to leave that to the reader.[[User:Kwib|Kwib]] ([[User talk:Kwib|talk]]) 13:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::I have just responded to your comments on Doctor Boogaloo's Talk page[[User:Kwib|Kwib]] ([[User talk:Kwib|talk]]) 13:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Alfonso RL == |
|||
Dear Stephen, I am editing together with a group of friends from Cambridge, the article regarding the Cambridge University Technology and Enterprise Club (CUTEC). However, it seens to be written "as an advert". We have change it since last reviewed and still we have that tag associate to it. Please let me know which parts of it exactly you think that are an advert, because we are trying to be as neutral as possible, and all the facts in it are real and verificable. |
|||
Best regards, |
|||
Alfonso RL |
|||
<small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Arlecuona|Arlecuona]] ([[User talk:Arlecuona|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Arlecuona|contribs]]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
:Thanks for your message, Arlecuona. I've replied at [[Talk:CUTEC]]. I think that's the best place in case other people want to comment too. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 11:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Bot activity== |
|||
I was going over the list of bots and noticed that {{user|CricketBot}} has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to [[Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots]] since this is a rather widely-posted message. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 18:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Definition of Blend== |
|||
Please look up [[blend]] before you try to correct it. Portmanteau words are specific instances of such things, and have special rules about them. It would be very hard to accidentally create one, and they involve syllabillic sounding. You are confusing compounds, blends, and the rest as portmanteau, which is inaccurate. The reason why I stated that the page was "wrong" was from the fact that portmanteau bags were kept separate, since they are one and the same. That is how analogies work. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 15:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I can only repeat that this distinction isn't borne out by the [[WP:RS|sources]]. Check the ''[[Punch (magazine)|Punch]]'' quotation from 1896: it's the first known use of the word "brunch" and it's described as a "portmanteau word". [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 15:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::First known use does not give the maker the right to determine its proper and true classification. That is up for a linguist. [http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/stgries/research/Blends_Linguistics.pdf Blends] as the source even states, its '''the''' common example of a blend. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 16:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
You are about to break 3RR and OR if you revert the Portmanteau page again. Lewis Carroll uses the term after a bag, and the word coined is based on that. By separating the two pages, you relying on OR, which goes against Wikipedia policy. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 16:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Wiki Stalking== |
|||
You have followed my edits and have thus committed Wiki Stalking. Please reverse your edits and apologize before I am forced to report you. The edits are, by definition, correct, and they are blends. Your actions are in violation of [[WP:HARASS]], and there is only one option for you, which is to apologize and revert yourself. [[User:Ottava Rima|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima|talk]]) 21:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Please do not throw words around like stalking and harrassment. Making such allegations is extremely serious and inappropriate. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 22:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==AfD nomination of Oxbridge== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated [[Oxbridge]], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]"). |
|||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Oxbridge | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxbridge]] | [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxbridge]] }} and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). |
|||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 10:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Fair use rationale for Image:Adelaideovalscoreboard.jpg== |
|||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Adelaideovalscoreboard.jpg]]'''. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|criteria for non-free content]], but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to [[:Image:Adelaideovalscoreboard.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. |
|||
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. [[User:STBotI|STBotI]] ([[User talk:STBotI|talk]]) 15:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Bohinj Lake/Lake Bohinj== |
|||
I've moved the article not because of the AE/BE, but because in Slovene the lake is not called ''(Jezero) Bohinj'', but ''Bohinjsko'' (of Bohinj, pertaining to Bohinj). --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 11:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for your note, Eleassar. But I still think that Lake Bohinj is the correct translation into English. Bohinj Lake just sounds very awkward. |
|||
:Actually, I'm not sure I'm right about American English. They put "River" after the name (e.g., Mississippi River) but I think they put "Lake" before the name (e.g., Lake Ontario). |
|||
:[[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 11:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm sorry, I don't know what sounds awkward; but I really don't see a good reason to call the lake 'Bohinj', if it's native name is not Bohinj. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 11:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::In that case we should find out what English-language references call the lake, although I think that "Lake Bohinj" is the standard English name. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 12:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::The Slovenia Tourist Board call it Lake Bohinj — see http://www.slovenia.info/?_ctg_kraji=2507. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 13:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::[http://www.slovenia.info/en/-ctg-kraji/Bohinj-Lake.htm?_ctg_kraji=2944&lng=2 Not always]. Even on the page you provided it is written also as Bohinj lake. --[[User:Eleassar|'''Eleassar''']] <sup>[[User talk:Eleassar|my talk]]</sup> 13:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== FAC consensus == |
|||
Thanks. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 09:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Web Analytics == |
|||
You state that WP:EL is clear on the list of blogs? |
|||
What about this saying: "Links to blogs and personal web pages, '''except those written by a recognized authority'''". I used some hours to collect this list of blogs from authorative writers... all of them well know and read by memebers of the practicing community. |
|||
Who is Stephen Turner anyhow? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.215.26.170|84.215.26.170]] ([[User talk:84.215.26.170|talk]]) 20:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Cambridge University Wikiproject == |
|||
Stephen, |
|||
Thanks for your advice about stub types - I didn't know that, and have responded to your comments at my [[User talk:A.C. Norman|talk page]]. |
|||
Are you still active in the University of Cambridge Wikiproject? If you look at the history, you'll see that I removed an "inactive" sign placed on it by a Bot, so I'm not sure whether it's fizzled out or not. |
|||
Andrew. [[User:A.C. Norman|A.C. Norman]] ([[User talk:A.C. Norman|talk]]) 11:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:To be honest, I'm not sure it ever fizzled in. I do keep an eye on several of the University of Cambridge articles, and I would contribute to WikiProject discussions if it ever got going, but there's never really been any activity on the project page. |
|||
:[[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 15:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] == |
|||
Dear Stephen, |
|||
Sincerely, thanks for reverting the POV. Sad day none-the-less, best wishes, Graham. --[[User:GrahamColm|Graham <font color="blue">Colm</font>]] [[User talk:GrahamColm|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 21:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== List of Wranglers FLC == |
|||
I've nominated [[List of Wranglers of the University of Cambridge]] for Featured List status as I've managed to get it complete. Your feedback at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Wranglers of the University of Cambridge]] would be welcome. [[User:Mrh30|Mrh30]] ([[User talk:Mrh30|talk]]) 08:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[List of World XI ODI cricketers]] at FLRC == |
|||
This article, which you significantly contributed to, has been nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates|Featured list removal candidate]]. Reveiwers' concerns are [[Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of World XI ODI cricketers|here]]. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 12:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Date-autoformatting removal script == |
|||
:P.S. I saw your "Pet hates" section and thought that this might be useful to you: |
|||
{{hide|bg1= FF F8 DC|contentcss=border:1px #008080solid; |headercss=color:black; |header= Installation and usage of date-autoformatting removal script|content=</br> |
|||
'''Instructions for installation''' |
|||
*EITHER: If you have a [[Special:Mypage/monobook.js|monobook]] already, go to it, click "edit this page", and paste in this string underneath your existing script: |
|||
:<code><nowiki>importScript('User:Lightmouse/monobook.js/script.js');</nowiki></code> |
|||
*OR: If you don't have a monobook.js page, create one using this title: |
|||
:<code><nowiki>[[User:[your username]/monobook.js]]</nowiki></code> |
|||
:Then click on "edit this page" and paste in at the top the "importScript" string you see three lines above here. |
|||
*Hit "Save page". |
|||
*Refresh your cache (instructions at top of monobook). |
|||
*You're ready to start. |
|||
'''Applying the script—it's very simple''' |
|||
*Go to an article and determine whether US or international format is used. (For this purpose, it's best to have selected "no preferences" for dates in your user preferences, which will display the raw date formats that our readers see. Otherwise, you'll need to check in edit mode.) Occasionally, you'll see that the wrong format is used (check [[Wikipedia:Mosnum#Full_date_formatting|MOSNUM's guidance on this]] carefully). |
|||
*Click on "edit this page". You'll see the list of script commands under "what links here". Click on either "delink all dates to dmy" (international format) or "delink all dates to mdy" (US format). |
|||
*The diff will automatically appear. Check through the changes you're making before saving them. If there are problems, fix them manually before saving, or cancel. |
|||
*Leave a note at the article talk page if editors need to negotiate which format to use, or need to be alerted to any other date-related issues. |
|||
*Click on "Save page": it's done. |
|||
'''Afterwards''' |
|||
*Respond politely and promptly to any critical comments on your talk page. If someone wants to resist or revert, it's better to ''back down'' and move on to improve other articles where WPians appreciate your efforts. ''NEVER edit-war over date autoformatting; raise the issue at [[WT:MOSNUM]].'' |
|||
'''Notes''' |
|||
*'''[1] Treats only square-bracketed dates.''' The script removes square brackets only, which mostly involves the main text and footnotes; it's acceptable for [[WP:MOSNUM#Format consistency|citation-generated dates]] to be of a different format, particularly ISO (which must not be used in the main text). |
|||
*'''[2] Piped year-links (<nowiki>[[1989 in baseball|1989]]</nowiki>).''' On purpose, the script will not touch these. |
|||
*'''[3] Date-sorting templates in tables.''' As of August 23, a minor tweak must be made to the script (which will update automatically), to deal with the column-sorting template in tables. Please be aware of this in relation to Featured Lists and the like (i.e., hold off there until it's fixed). The "dts" and "dts2" templates are at issue, and can be identified in display mode by a small clickable item at the top of a column. This should be fixed soon. |
|||
*'''[4] Antiquity-related articles.''' Articles on topics such as ancient Rome should be treated with caution, since the script removes year-links as well, and some editors may argue that there's a case for retaining the simple year and century links from ancient times (e.g., [[212]]). It's better to ask first in these cases. In any case, such articles contain few if any full dates. |
|||
}} [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 01:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks very much. I'll have a look at that some time. [[User:Stephen Turner|Stephen Turner]] ([[User talk:Stephen Turner|Talk]]) 08:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==''Signpost'' updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009== |
==''Signpost'' updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009== |
||
Revision as of 13:36, 14 January 2009
Old discussions: Nov 2004 – Jun 2005, Jul – Aug 2005, Sep – Nov 2005, Dec 2005, Jan – Feb 2006, Mar – Apr 2006, May – Aug 2006, Sep – Dec 2006, all 2007, all 2008
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)