Jump to content

Talk:Natasha Lyonne: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 67.174.207.132 - "HIV positive?: new section"
Line 32: Line 32:


is this true she has a hep c and HIV co infection? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.174.207.132|67.174.207.132]] ([[User talk:67.174.207.132|talk]]) 05:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
is this true she has a hep c and HIV co infection? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.174.207.132|67.174.207.132]] ([[User talk:67.174.207.132|talk]]) 05:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

She is CO-INFECTED according to People

Revision as of 18:07, 17 January 2009

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.


funny how i found this..... from a list of jewish actors. 199.185.87.42 20:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

warrant out for her arrest, after she failed to appear at a court date Friday Mon Jan 30 2006

This is not a news station, but an encyclopedia.Mikereichold 06:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're an idiot, Mikereichold, it's just an update... Do you have any information contradicting the neutrality? And no, I'm not the person who wrote it, just someone who wondered why the entry was flagged.

Does seem a little silly to flag it; it's not bad, just focuses on the Oprah-worthy issues a bit much. It might've gone into more about her film roles rather than the tabloid stuff. However for that at least, it's okay. Kuma

Her film roles? LOL! Her sterling perfomance as the feminist in American Pie and as the girl with the overextended hooters in Slums of Beverly Hills? Yeah, that took all of a sentence. In all fairness, the only reason anyone is visiting this page is because she's a trainwreck.

I don't think the tags are inappropriate. I'll try and work on the article someCrumbsucker 03:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded the article quite a bit. I didn't feel there was any problem with it's neutrality. I included comments made by her landlord and neighbors and also comments refuting them by her father. I did think the article needed a little cleaning up and Crumbsucker did a good job. Still, I think a little more information on the reasons for her eviction ought to be reinstated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.141.103.93 (talkcontribs) 23:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Conservative with big C or little c?

Did she grow up in the Conservative movement of Judaism or with a conservative political ideology? Or both? Valley2city 22:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

http://z.about.com/d/crime/1/0/W/8/lyonnenatasha.jpg

I think this is a booking photo for an arrest and as such is in the public domain. 216.153.214.89 (talk) 04:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HIV positive?

is this true she has a hep c and HIV co infection? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.207.132 (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She is CO-INFECTED according to People