User talk:NE Ent

Forsena

I really can't believe what kind of garbage I found here about me [1]. You did not mention that the user you are mentioning Angelo De La Paz (I still say he is a POV editor because he was and he will always be, just take a look at his edits) insulted me many times (called me a Serbian vandal and a nationalist fanatic) before I even knew anything about him. Of course when I answered you used that as an argument to ban me. What you didn't mention was that the user insulted me first, created POV edits (which he later reverted). One more thing, if you warned me I would have listened to your warning but I DO NOT CARE for the warnings of an Albanian extremist who insults me and then warns me for reverting his POV edits. Your block really shocked me and proved to me that Serbophobia is spread on Wikipedia too. --Forsena (talk) 19:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Please see [[2]]. Gerardw (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Removal of message

It was removed because telling people to go elsewhere isn't a solution, like I briefed in the edit summary. Also it could be considered spamming.--Otterathome (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

That was quick! Thanks so much. Any suggestions for DYK? We could try for that just for George. :) Julia Rossi (talk) 02:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

No matter, I'll tackle it – so that's how recent changes goes (I learned something new). You have my respect, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

3rr

I noticed this - the edits in question were nearly a day ago, and the other editor has retired. How then, is Noclador 'currently engaged in an edit war'? — neuro^(talk) 03:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

3 reverts in a 24 hour period, listed below. Gerardw (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

That was not my point. My point was that the editor was in no way 'currently engaged in an edit war'. — neuro^(talk) 12:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Steinerner Steg

Hi Gerardw, you're a bit mistaken. I did a single revert within the last 24 hours and the article hasn't changed for over 13 hours. Also the user that caused all this commotion (user:Icsunonove) and edited against all other editors involved is currently at the centre of this inccident report: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Icsunonove and IP 192.45.72.26 and additionally two Wikiquette alerts Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Icsunonove Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Icsunonove II. Therefore I removed your notice on my talkpage. --noclador (talk) 03:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

[3] 1

[4] 2

[5] 3 Gerardw (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

that was 2 days ago, not "You currently appear to be engaged..." There was no 3RR vio. there will be no 3RR vio. so, unnecessary warning and btw. the book is wrong and that is verifiable. --noclador (talk) 04:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Krayeske

GerardW

Obviously, everyone thinks what happened to them is important. While the entry about me in Governor M. Jodi Rell's wiki page was unsourced, plenty on the internet exists to verify what occurred. http://www.the40yearplan.com/Ken_Krayeske_InauguRell_Arrest_Story_Repository.php If you don't trust my resository, go here: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/mt/mt-ctnj.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=ken+krayeske or for the original story: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/courts/reporter_arrested_for_politica.php or ctlocalpolitics, which is a prominent political bulletin board in Connecticut. http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?s=ken+krayeske+arrest

Additionally, what exactly is your bar for determining what is important? Is the state police jailing a non-violent political opponent of the governor on trumped up charges important? Whether in a developing nation or the United States of America, I tend to think that it is valid to note that an executive law enforcement agency overseen by a sitting governor was involved in harassing and intimidating a political opponent. Is important the front page of a newspaper? Multiple days on major local television news? In reading the Wikipedia references on notability, it seems to me that this incident meets the bar for notability.

I think it is valid and wise to include this. I think it does a disservice to the readers of Wikipedia to eliminate references to the Governor's

Thanks, Ken Krayeske Ken _at_ the40yearplan.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.141.212 (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)