User talk:Baseball Bugs/Snapshot100130: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:59, 25 January 2009

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article nor the talk page for an encyclopedia article. Be aware that if you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mindless parrot. Be aware that the page may be inundated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself, if that. Be aware that this user likes to say "Be aware that..." Be aware that the original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baseball_Bugs/Snapshot100130.

Ark-Hives

Useful warnings

Caution to vandals on WP:ANI: Don't get Plaxicoed.

Vandalism warnings

Your proposition may be good / But let's have one thing understood / Whatever it is, I'm against it / And even when you've changed it or condensed it / I'm against it.

Proposed change to warning boxes inspired by another editor [1]

a compliant has been opended regarding youse behavieurs on WP:ANI. Please refrain from subtle vnadlaism.
No matter how subltel you think youa rebing you can e suiqt secertian that you are still commiting an act of vandlaism.
if you merely need an d outlet to practice editing please see WP:SANDBOX DINTRSTEAD of mutiliating articles on the mainspace ot violating articles here on wikipedia.
I hope you will return to make many mroe sponstructive edits in the future.
IF you require a sponsor, please see WP:SPONSOR to assit you in making many better editors into the near future.

Now, who can argue with that?
Not only is it authentic internet gibberish, but it expresses a courage that is little seen in this day and age.

Spam warnings

3RR warnings

Transients welcome

Letters from fans

BASEBALLS BUGS IS AN UGLY IGNORANT FOOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.166.166 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're stupid. Mayallld (talk) 01:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about that obviously immature Basebuggs? Tanninglamp 20:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe! ROFLMFAO! @ Baseball Bugs. That guy makes the dumbest jokes. You gotta love him for trying though. LMFAO! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! =D Cheers! Cheers dude 05:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehehehehehehe! Baseball Bugs is a cutie. 65.31.103.28 05:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem? Why are you being a jerk? 69.14.244.157 (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AN/I and your latest "fan"

Hi Bugs, hoping to slip under the radar since you've been "reported" and I don't want to be seen to be associated with you in case the "moderators" link me with you...

Doctor Who is a time traveller; it looked to me like the anon IP thought they could travel through time and edit their previous comment to justify their "What are you talking about?"-comment. Now I come to think of it, 1984's "memory hole" might have been a better analogy.

This IP is funnee!

Cheers (and good luck evading those "moderators" now you've "been reported"!), This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 11:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators make me nervous. But moderators really scare me. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's those scooters they ride. Terrifying. This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 11:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth warning

And reported again. Its truly amazing that you actually think that you cannot be reported for threatening and insulting users outside of an articles dicussion page, really. We are all happy you've ended your ignorant, racist revert war, but im more than happy to see you blocked for this continued harrassment. :) 121.221.33.231 (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Harlequin[reply]

Not that I'm sure you care, but this IP has now been blocked Fritzpoll (talk) 11:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was hoping he might give me enough info that I could find the previous, similar message on this subject. But the block should slap that mosquito down for awhile. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 12:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States Presidential names

Might you take a look over there? I inherited criteria from Cumulus Clouds (I know - amazing) but the new criterion being offered seems to be "if I can find it in Google, it belongs, no matter how pejorative" or the like. Merci! Collect (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been seeing that, and biden' my time. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 12:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. One of the few things CC and I agreed on, I fear. I can find several hundred pejorative nicknames to add if that is how the consensus moves <eg>. (and "biden" <g>) Collect (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Biased removal"

"Biased removal" I think you have miscontrued a later talk page comment from me about not supporting the miracle angle, as being the reason for this removal which pre-dated it. On the contrary, I merely removed it because a bunch of news links had been removed previously, and this new one stood out like a sore thumb. I don't care either way, its not like EL sections are hard to manage. But your edit summary confused me is all. MickMacNee (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 07:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hope you have a great day DegenFarang (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Back at ya. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 16:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

I noticed, there actually were editors suggesting Obama's assumed office date shoul be January 21, 2009 (due to the re-swearing in). Were those folks, serious? GoodDay (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously ignorant, at least. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was amazed -- in CT at least, al that counts is the "intent" to take an oath for it to be binding. I suspect this is true elsewhere as well (example abound wjere people goof on wedding vows etc.). Collect (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball articles

You have been interested in vandalism on baseball pages in the past. Just a note to let you know that I have found Jackal4 to be disruptive of late on such pages.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear to me what the dispute is. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outside the park home runs

Hi. Is it correct that if runners fail to touch a base or one overtakes another then they can be out on appeal in all games of baseball? If so, surely this is a rule of the game as a whole rather than a rule of MLB? Dancarney (talk) 10:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a baseball rule. It's a fundamental of the game. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 10:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ow, the puns... they hurt

I hope you don't mind that I want to appropriate some of the userboxes you have... and thank you for all of the humor on your page. If you ask me, the fourth pillar of Wikipedia should be "Remember to laugh." ("Memento ridere," in homage to the Roman version of the saying.)
Separately, I see you just peeked in at SPLC - thank you for that as well. arimareiji (talk) 14:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try also "Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuavabit." Collect (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just Curious

hey bugs, I'm just curious .. how come you're not an admin? I know you have a sense of humor and all, but you've been around for a long time, and you clearly know right from wrong. just wondered. Ched (talk) 02:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 203: / Line 203: @@
 :Try also "Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuavabit."  [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 20:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
+== Just Curious ==
+hey bugs, I'm just curious .. how come you're not an admin?  I know you have a sense of humor and all, but you've been around for a long time, and you clearly know right from wrong.  just wondered.  [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ([[User talk:Ched Davis|talk]]) 02:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)