Talk:League of the Three Emperors: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Editing== |
==Editing== |
||
I'm going to begin cleaning up this article, check out any edits I make and see if they need any changes. --[[User:Banime|Banime]] ([[User talk:Banime|talk]]) 11:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC) |
I'm going to begin cleaning up this article, check out any edits I make and see if they need any changes. --[[User:Banime|Banime]] ([[User talk:Banime|talk]]) 11:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Drei-Kaiserbund== |
|||
Wasnt there also a drei kaiserbund with the ottomans involved? Is there an article about this? [[Special:Contributions/77.248.188.153|77.248.188.153]] ([[User talk:77.248.188.153|talk]]) 14:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:30, 30 January 2009
Germany Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
This page appears lifted from grade 12 history notes - while the German page isn't the best in the world, are there any objections to a translation of it? -AD, Heidelberg, May '06
Yes, the three emperors is completely wrong.
It's not Kaiser Wilhelm II but the I
Tt's Francis Joseph.
And finally it's not Alexander the III but the II.
cheers /Hari5
Furthermore, Russia did not secretly rejoin the league of Three Emperors. Rather, they secretly signed the Reinsurance Treaty with Germany that, going against the Dual Alliance of 1879, says Germany and Russia will remain neutral if one of them is attacked by another country except in the case of Germany attacking France or Russia attacking Austria. Then the individual country could decide what to do.--D'Artagan (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Editing
I'm going to begin cleaning up this article, check out any edits I make and see if they need any changes. --Banime (talk) 11:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Drei-Kaiserbund
Wasnt there also a drei kaiserbund with the ottomans involved? Is there an article about this? 77.248.188.153 (talk) 14:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)