Jump to content

Talk:KDE/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 69.223.24.72 - "→‎Licensing-issues: "
→‎SimpleKDE: Removed - dead link
Line 39: Line 39:
:It's not an operating system. [http://www.kde.org/download/distributions.php Here you find OS's shipping KDE] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Momet|Momet]] ([[User talk:Momet|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Momet|contribs]]) 15:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It's not an operating system. [http://www.kde.org/download/distributions.php Here you find OS's shipping KDE] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Momet|Momet]] ([[User talk:Momet|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Momet|contribs]]) 15:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==[[SimpleKDE]]==


[[SimpleKDE]]? http://www.simplekde.org/node/7/default.htm -- [[User:Writtenonsand|Writtenonsand]] 00:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
:What about it? [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 04:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


== Some reorganization is needed, badly ==
== Some reorganization is needed, badly ==

Revision as of 02:44, 31 January 2009

Former good articleKDE/Archive 4 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 15, 2006Good article nomineeListed
November 9, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Talk archived

Talk page was getting difficult to follow and people were adding comments to sections which had been dead for three years. I've split the archives up into three sections: early commentary, a huge licensing flame war and later comments. Chris Cunningham 09:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Icon designer

The designer for the KDE icon was David Vignoni. I don't know where to include this in this article; perhaps someone else has a better idea. Stwalkerster 17:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Made TimeLine into a table

Put the timeline section into a table, looks neater in my opinion. feel free to change it back if you disagree.

Also I've put it on the Linux WikiProject page but I might as well put it here as well... We need a separate wikiproject for KDE and GNOME, anyone willing to start one or participate should reply to this or the aforementioned Linux project talk page.

History

Was KDE developed Specifically to replace CDE? The history on kde.org seems to sidestep the question, and I'm sure for good corporate relations they would not want to advertise that KDE is built on the failures of CDE. But the name KDE suggests that its a CDE replacement and I think a neutral Wikipedia article should cite sources confirming or denying the original intent here. Cuvtixo 16:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please could somebody answer this b4 it is deleted?

Is this an operating system of do i need to download unix as well? thanks

It's not an operating system. Here you find OS's shipping KDE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Momet (talkcontribs) 15:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Some reorganization is needed, badly

KDE 4 is out, but we should reorganize the KDE article instead of updating. I believe we should have the main article provide general information, history, and blurbs about present and past releases and have separate articles that are more in depth for KDE 3 and KDE 4 (Keep the current KDE 4 article, make a KDE 3 article). Articles with now outdated KDE 3 tech should be given a last update and programs in KDE 4 should have an update with new screenshots and icons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeith (talkcontribs) 00:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing-issues

Is it just me, or is the part about "licensing-issues" forced and arbitary? It seems like someone went out of their way to mention that point? Also, it contains claims that are somewhat unsubstantiated, like the claim that commercial apps usually use GTK+ instead of Qt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.30.176.84 (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LGPL license option added toqt (as of 2009/01/14) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.223.24.72 (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

windows?

since when can kde be used on windows (i.e not using a linux that runs on windows) under the platform windows is listed.. can someone cite a refence to that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.175.199 (talk) 18:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://windows.kde.org/ Brisvegas 22:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

maybe this could be a section in the articale because kde on windows is not really mainstreem more "testing" according to the website.. or maybe where it says windows we could put that link as a cite refence..

Release dates

I've been looking for the initial release dates for each major version (1.0, 2.0, 3.0 & 4.0) but neither this site (under history) not the sites dealing with more specific versions gives the initial release date, just the latest. EDIT: Found the release date for 1.0, but none of the rest.74.207.74.156 (talk) 21:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.207.74.156 (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Kandalf complete

I have completed the merge from Kandalf and placed the main content in the "Identity" section. Edit the result as appropriate. —Danorton (talk) 00:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]