Jump to content

Talk:Cicisbeo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
K.C. Tang (talk | contribs)
→‎Pronounciation: Fixed title and added signature
Line 5: Line 5:
|[[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|Wikipedia|right|40px]]
|[[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|Wikipedia|right|40px]]
|}
|}
===Pronounciation===
==Pronounciation==
What a great word - but how is it pronounced? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:195.134.6.202|195.134.6.202]] ([[User talk:195.134.6.202|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/195.134.6.202|contribs]]) 13:32, 23 December 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
What a great word - but how is it pronounced?
:See the article, there's now an IPA version of the word :-) [[User:Mstroeck|Mstroeck]] 18:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
:See the article, there's now an IPA version of the word :-) [[User:Mstroeck|Mstroeck]] 18:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)



Revision as of 12:09, 2 February 2009

Did You Know An entry from Cicisbeo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 30 March, 2006.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Pronounciation

What a great word - but how is it pronounced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.134.6.202 (talkcontribs) 13:32, 23 December 2005

See the article, there's now an IPA version of the word :-) Mstroeck 18:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cavalier Servente

Is this the same as a Cavalier Servente? - see Beppo - Cutler 18:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see that it is [1] XXXVI-XXXVII - Cutler 18:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is! Thank you for pointing it out, that was a regrettable ommission... Mstroeck 18:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question - always single?

Fascinating article. The article states:

Customs of the time did not permit them to engage in relationships with any other women during their free time, making the arrangement rather demanding.

Does this includes wives, implying Cicisbeo were always (or mostly) single?-- Singkong2005 02:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Singkong. Thank you, I also think it's pretty interesting. Yes, Cicisbei were mostly single. In fact, many of them led a life of almost complete inactivity apart from the time they spent with their mistress. They often were younger sons of noble houses and by definition had no real place in society at that time. That's something want to make more clear in the article, I just have not gotten around to do it yet. Mstroeck 22:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm almost tempted to make a Wikipedia user box: "This user is available as a Cicisbeo... --Singkong2005 23:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. That would be excellent :-) Mstroeck 23:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

minor comments

lovely article! concise and intriguing. just two minor comments:

  • the "J.G. Krünitz" external link cannot be accessed, or is it just my computer?
  • the section name "General" looks a bit odd to me... perhaps an article of this lovely length doesn't need division of sections at all (except the notes and bibliography).--K.C. Tang 07:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for your comments! The link works for me. There is a link on the page which says "direkt zum Artikel", which means "go directly to the article", and which you have to click. Unfortunately, the website does not seem to allow deep linking directly to articles... And you are of course right, the "General" heading was unnecessary, I removed it. --mstroeck 08:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I can access the link now! btw, would you also start the "petit-maître" article? I don't know what exactly a petit-maître means (a young man who dresses and behaves like a woman?), and why is he comparable to a cicisbeo (Was a petit-maître also employed as lovers by the noblewomen?). want to learn more. Cheers.--K.C. Tang 09:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
forgive my nitpicking, but i've got two more questions:
  • should the orthography be cicisbèo? and should the stress fall on the "e"?
  • could we have any source for the etymology? some sources say that the word derives from French chiche beau (it sounds rather unlikely to me), but in any case it seems that we cannot be quite sure of the etymology, so it may be good to have a source for that.--K.C. Tang 11:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]