User talk:Vianello

please close my account

i do not wish to be on wikipedia any more after this last series of attacks upon me by lawton thank you VIANELLO? --kathy-treks-on (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Barbarian Overlords

Can you tell me why The Barbarian Overlords were not noteworthy to remain on wikipedia?

Joe

Thanks

Thanks a bunch for your 'attack page' warning. I have no clue who was trying to do what.. So I mentioned it to Ice Cold Beer. Although I have not received a reply from this fine admin, he appears to be taking care of things.. How did you notice that page? (Frankly, I'm surprised that anyone went through that much trouble, or even bothered reading my userpage.) I assume some vandal got mad. Considering as reverting, warning and typos are about all the editing I do... It's darned near a certainty. 'Sigh.' There are times I wish the vandals would just stop... And then I realize how bored I would get..

In any case, thanks again for your help to me, and, of course, your help to this community as a whole.

𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 ^talk 01:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Porn for the blind

Hello. I saw you previously agreed that "Porn For the Blind" should be deleted, and recently I nominated it as well. However, a bunch of people do not understand (like you did) that it is a hoax. I saw you also agreed it should be deleted in the past. Can you reiterate your position here? Are you allowed to? Thanks. Angelatomato (talk) 09:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Porn_for_the_Blind_(2nd_nomination)

Added Robert M Heller to articles for deletion log

Hey, I hope you don't mind. I took the liberty of adding Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_M_Heller to the articles for deletion log page. Liberal Classic (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I checked your contribs and didn't see that you had edited the log. Sometimes I forget a step. I guess I need to learn to use Twinkle to automate more stuff. :) Liberal Classic (talk) 00:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

vianello, as i had mentioned i am not the sole author of that page, so i dont see it as a conflict of interest. it's a budding page, i say give it time to grow. also can you give me more information about this twinkle program.Martinschmit (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

i cant seem to edit my article talk page. and lets give it some time. ay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinschmit (talk • contribs) 02:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

OK. well i found out how to edit the talk page. it's my first page and i think it would be nice to get this page up. this person was in a movie. people like mark schiff have pages and i've never even heard of the guy. he even has a notability issue on his. just give it time. it will not be a problem. Martinschmit (talk) 02:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

you will probably delete it. this person is a budding comedian, if you don't see THAT as notable, you shouldn't be flagging pages left and right. Martinschmit (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

its not really up to you i would say as you don't have those administrative capabilities. once the page has been finished, probably by tommorow night. also two of the flags are not appropriate. just one question though, if someone made a page on a topic you were unaware of, and they weren't quite finished with it, would you flag that too? CONCLUDED, SIR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinschmit (talk • contribs) 03:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

i've dropped you several lines, as you've just responded to one of them. in none of your responses have you given me an adequate answer. there are many comedian pages on wikipedia, this is just one more. this isn't a page about a friend's birthday or something of that sort. this is a page, about a chicago comedian, who you happen to know nothing of yet. the page will be complete master vianello, just you wait. Martinschmit (talk) 03:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

how should i cite this person to you? should i explain their background? do they have to be on another website, before they are on this one? i'm being serious here. and i believe i know what reliable sources are, i'd just like you to specify. just to be fair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinschmit (talk • contribs) 03:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Question

Could you explaine me what is criteria for writers and philosophers (verification, number of books or papers)?--Vojvodaeist 20:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I need some time to finish article. Could you give me one day before deletion?--Vojvodaeist 20:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok. I'll do it. Please don't be angry. I don't know criterias but I'll read it as son as I can. Thanks for help.--Vojvodaeist 20:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Starting a new project

Can you explain me how can I start new project on Wikipedia?--Vojvodaeist 16:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Cosgrove (writer)

Thanks for correcting this - I've got no idea what either manga or anime are, and managed to misremember which one it was from the article! PamD (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

CSD Tagging

Hello. You just tagged James Michael Mitchell as WP:G1, or patent nonsense. While the page should be deleted under a CSD criteria, patent nonsense only applies to pages that are incomprehensible. I have therefore replaced the speedy on that page with a more appropriate one. Just wanted to let you know; G1s are very specific and James Michael Mitchell does not qualify. Thanks. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Vianello. You have new messages at Darth Panda's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yasus Afaris

What the hell have you done with this article? It's a preliminary article about a significant dub poet. By what right do you decide that his bio is not important. I'd like to have him restored until some knowledgeable people can discuss his appropriateness on Wikipedia. Pmbcomm (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I was slandered beyond words by rklawton for the last 5 years

now that he is an administrator he has been without mercy towards me because i porved him wrong on the Lincoln death photograph, nothing against you or anybody else here, but he has been horrible to me of late, guess i snapped., sorry, i just wont edit anymore for awhile, okay?

Again I am sorry I just snapped when I saw what rk has done to my photographs at wikicommons and here , i had been doing so well and for so long and then this guy becomes an administrator and raises hells fire against me and OTHERS who he used to have disagreements with....i feel powerless to do anything about it or him...it is too bad, i am going to miss wikipedia alot.

I am broken hearted by this monster who calls himself a man, mr rklawton.

-(

--kathy-treks-on (talk) 06:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)