User talk:JSR: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Hi again. Sorry to disturb. Pls see my addition on SLS in the Indian inventions article. The refs may not be as great as the others but I believe for now it would suffice. Your input is welcomed there and in this [[Same language subtitling]] article I created. Enjoy! [[User:Exxoo|Exxoo]] ([[User talk:Exxoo|talk]]) 19:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
:Hi again. Sorry to disturb. Pls see my addition on SLS in the Indian inventions article. The refs may not be as great as the others but I believe for now it would suffice. Your input is welcomed there and in this [[Same language subtitling]] article I created. Enjoy! [[User:Exxoo|Exxoo]] ([[User talk:Exxoo|talk]]) 19:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
::What do u think about the SLS addition? Do they constitute reliable sources in your opinion? I have |
::What do u think about the SLS addition? Do they constitute reliable sources in your opinion? I have also just included [[Simputer]] to the list of inventions. Pls have a look to see if it's appropriate. [[User:Exxoo|Exxoo]] ([[User talk:Exxoo|talk]]) 19:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
== [[Education in India]] == |
== [[Education in India]] == |
||
Revision as of 19:42, 16 February 2009
| This is JSR's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2 |
|
Great work. I noticed a reassessment request on WP India's Assessment dept page, the top grade the list can get from the WP India is "List". Nominate the article at WP:Featured list, the top grade a list can get in wikipedia. I suggest you initiate a WP:peer review, before the Featured List nomiantion. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again. Sorry to disturb. Pls see my addition on SLS in the Indian inventions article. The refs may not be as great as the others but I believe for now it would suffice. Your input is welcomed there and in this Same language subtitling article I created. Enjoy! Exxoo (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- What do u think about the SLS addition? Do they constitute reliable sources in your opinion? I have also just included Simputer to the list of inventions. Pls have a look to see if it's appropriate. Exxoo (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Sure looking. In the meantime, some review adverts of my own. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Random things, in case you forgot, but likely you just haven't gotten around to it
- Girls and castes. You should explain the situation before telling people that they are targeted for extra assistance
- Status of private schools, church schools etc
- Need to explain whether IIT being "important -> more money? more research funding?
- Literacy rates need discussion, initiatives, backwardness in Bihar/UP etc.
- Business partnerships with universities?
- Are there pay degrees in India -> ie can pay more money to get admittance if you fail entrance exams
- Political interference issues? Historical revisionism of textbooks to appease certain groups or whatever...
Invincibles
- Invincibles
Our future Featured topic:
- RO - Refs in # order?
- J - Jargon run?
- I read through it and it seems OK for a start. I'm really sorry I cannot help much with the facts because I'm not familiar with education in India; I've never studied there nor have I read much on the topic. However I made some minor changes which if you don't favour you can revert. By the way good job on the article overhaul... actually reconstruction :)!! Exxoo (talk) 13:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- HAve a good trip. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 01:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I went through and made a few correctons, tried to improve the text a little so the English is a little more international while still preserving most of the Indian English usage. There's a lot of over-treferencing here, with nearly every sentence having an in-text citation, but then again there are a lot of stats quoted and they do need to be directly referenced. I'd agree the leading paragrapgh needs to be imprved, with less nubers on the improved recent standards and more on the structure. Mdw0 (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and for your edits everyone. I really appreciate it since I could not do as much as I should have since the last few days. Once again thank you :) JSR 0562 18:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)