Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Peer review/Vincent Ogé: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 07:18, 28 February 2009

Vincent Ogé

The article is an amalgam of two separate articles, both inadequately sourced. This has now been addressed with reference to the Louverture project. No huge concerns were raised about the information merged, although there may have been some small inconsistency of details which I may have taken an arbitrary stand on. I have just added a couple of links to Googlebooks, and will have a look at these at my leisure. The Louverture project is a wiki. A peer review and verification by knowledgeable persons with access to other material would be highly desirable.

Ohconfucius (talk) 03:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the article and it seemed fine. I added a reference but I'm unclear about wether it is OK to cite primary sources in Wikipedia articles.

Revision as of 08:03, 9 January 2009 edit Ohconfucius (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 328,939 edits m →Vincent Ogé ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 07:18, 28 February 2009 edit undo Stewart king (talk \| contribs) 117 edits No edit summary
Line 3:		Line 3:

	[[User:Ohconfucius\|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius\|talk]]) 03:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Ohconfucius\|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius\|talk]]) 03:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


			I looked at the article and it seemed fine. I added a reference but I'm unclear about wether it is OK to cite primary sources in Wikipedia articles.