Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Romanian hay.jpg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Romanian hay: Keep |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Weak keep.''' FWIW it ''does'' meet the current size guidelines (and I don't regard that as a good reason to delist regardless). Apart from that, no it's not stunning, is unfortunately a bit cutoff at top, I can't imagine it would pass on today's standards, but it's not terrible either and has certain charms which appeal. This is the type of thing I can live with as an older FP. --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 13:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep.''' FWIW it ''does'' meet the current size guidelines (and I don't regard that as a good reason to delist regardless). Apart from that, no it's not stunning, is unfortunately a bit cutoff at top, I can't imagine it would pass on today's standards, but it's not terrible either and has certain charms which appeal. This is the type of thing I can live with as an older FP. --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 13:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' pretty much per Jron, it's still an appealing, encyclopedic and pretty good image which outweighs the reasons given to delist. [[User:Cat-five|Cat-five]] - [[User talk:Cat-five|talk]] 06:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' pretty much per Jron, it's still an appealing, encyclopedic and pretty good image which outweighs the reasons given to delist. [[User:Cat-five|Cat-five]] - [[User talk:Cat-five|talk]] 06:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delist''' Poor quality. The fact that it's an older FP is a very poor reason to keep. -- [[User:AJ24|AJ24]] ([[User talk:AJ24|talk]]) 14:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 14:02, 10 March 2009
- Reason
- Nom'ed in 2005.
Currently does not meet the size requirements. In addition,the quality is not really up to par; note the quality of the grass, especially in the foreground. - Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Traditional hay stack
- Nominator
- ωαdεstεr16♣TC♣
- Delist — ωαdεstεr16♣TC♣ 00:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Weak keep. FWIW it does meet the current size guidelines (and I don't regard that as a good reason to delist regardless). Apart from that, no it's not stunning, is unfortunately a bit cutoff at top, I can't imagine it would pass on today's standards, but it's not terrible either and has certain charms which appeal. This is the type of thing I can live with as an older FP. --jjron (talk) 13:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep pretty much per Jron, it's still an appealing, encyclopedic and pretty good image which outweighs the reasons given to delist. Cat-five - talk 06:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delist Poor quality. The fact that it's an older FP is a very poor reason to keep. -- AJ24 (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
