Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 February 27: Difference between revisions
m Dating comment by Jkl sem - "→File:Empro1.jpg: " |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==== [[:File:Empro1.jpg]] ==== |
==== [[:File:Empro1.jpg]] ==== |
||
Sorry... I took this picture myself, plus the ad/poster is quite old at this point (from year 2000?). Perhaps it's a violation, but it seems extremely unlikely here that anyone would object |
Sorry... I took this picture myself, plus the ad/poster is quite old at this point (from year 2000?) and was related to the 'grand opening' of EMP, not an everyday image. Perhaps it's a violation, but it seems extremely unlikely here that anyone would object. If it's still against the rules, I don't mind it being removed. [[User:Jkl sem|jkl_sem]] ([[User talk:Jkl sem|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 05:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Really not sure here. It's a picture of an ad/poster. What does that count as, if anything? ~ '''[[User:JohnnyMrNinja|<font color="#206080">JohnnyMrNinja</font>]]''' 08:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
Really not sure here. It's a picture of an ad/poster. What does that count as, if anything? ~ '''[[User:JohnnyMrNinja|<font color="#206080">JohnnyMrNinja</font>]]''' 08:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:01, 11 March 2009
February 27
It's a bird, it's a plane, it's Baku87 taking satellite pictures. Baku87 uploads pictures to his website than gives permission to use it on wikipedia. That's clever. VartanM (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry... I took this picture myself, plus the ad/poster is quite old at this point (from year 2000?) and was related to the 'grand opening' of EMP, not an everyday image. Perhaps it's a violation, but it seems extremely unlikely here that anyone would object. If it's still against the rules, I don't mind it being removed. jkl_sem (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC).
Really not sure here. It's a picture of an ad/poster. What does that count as, if anything? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 08:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Nobody's commented, the uploader is not active. It is a reproduction of a copyrighted 2D image, so I think that is just blatant copyvio. The uploader has released the image as GFDL, but it's still non-free, and unused. I think. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Image is taken from artist's MySpace, nothing to indicate it is licensed as claimed (other URL shown on the image description page deadlinks) ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Contains various non-free logos. — neuro(talk) 23:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Logos are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)