User talk:71.111.162.63: Difference between revisions
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Fairly spoken == |
== Fairly spoken THF == |
||
As an irregular contributor to Wikipedia it's sad to see the political POV agenda of "Collect" trump factually based editorial judgments. |
As an irregular contributor to Wikipedia it's sad to see the political POV agenda of "Collect" trump factually based editorial judgments. |
||
Revision as of 17:41, 11 March 2009
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Collect, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. THF (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Fairly spoken THF
As an irregular contributor to Wikipedia it's sad to see the political POV agenda of "Collect" trump factually based editorial judgments.
Looking at "Collects" revision history it includes serially removing anything that might reflect poorly on right wing spokespeople like Rush Limbaugh and Amity Shlaes, while including material that falsely portrays both of them in a positive light.
"Collects" inclusion of the Leonhardt article in the Amity Shlaes article was truncated in a way that warped the overall writing of Leonhardt on Shlaes.
When a balance was given that directly took from the same Leonhardt article on Shlaes was subsequently removed by "Collect" it clearly revealed a POV by "Collect" inconsistent with Wikipedia's mission (assuming Wikipedia doesn't want to become a ColbertNation punchline).
Respectfully, THF, "civility" doesn't trump factual NPOV.