User talk:Magnius: Difference between revisions
→? vandalism on Clevedon: new section |
questioning why my post was removed |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|style="vertical: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For adding the hundreds of citations to the [[List of cyberpunk works]],<br /> going far beyond the intended cleanup --[[User:Yobmod|Yobmod]] ([[User ta.lk:Yobmod|talk]]) |
|style="vertical: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For adding the hundreds of citations to the [[List of cyberpunk works]],<br /> going far beyond the intended cleanup --[[User:Yobmod|Yobmod]] ([[User ta.lk:Yobmod|talk]]) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Re: Cyberpunk == |
|||
My comment was not original research. If you followed the links provided in my post, you would see that they are existing games which enjoy enormous popularity. [[Syndicate Wars]] Whilst I accept the speculation about the sequel to not be confirmed (even though it is based on a published article, as included in the link) I don't appreciate your removal of the comment without examining the links. They are real. They exist. If this isn't a basis for adding content to wikipedia, what is? |
|||
== Re: Eleventh Doctor == |
== Re: Eleventh Doctor == |
||
Revision as of 13:53, 14 March 2009
|
The Science Fiction Barnstar | |
| For adding the hundreds of citations to the List of cyberpunk works, going far beyond the intended cleanup --Yobmod (talk) |
Re: Cyberpunk
My comment was not original research. If you followed the links provided in my post, you would see that they are existing games which enjoy enormous popularity. Syndicate Wars Whilst I accept the speculation about the sequel to not be confirmed (even though it is based on a published article, as included in the link) I don't appreciate your removal of the comment without examining the links. They are real. They exist. If this isn't a basis for adding content to wikipedia, what is?
Re: Eleventh Doctor
Yeah, I know the 3RR. It'd be more constructive for you to actually state the reason for your revert, though, instead of just citing a policy. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 23:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- The 3RR IS the reason for the revert. If you know the rules, why are you insisting on entering into an edit war? There is a discussion going on, join it and influence the outcome. magnius (talk) 23:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
? vandalism on Clevedon
Can I ask which edit of mine on Clevedon you consider to be vandalism? My only recent edit to that article was to add the category Category:Civil parishes in Somerset which is accurate. I believe you meant to put the notice on the talk page of an anon user 86.131.0.161. — Rod talk 21:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)