Jump to content

User talk:HighInBC: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 35: Line 35:


::Hehe, my real secret is that I am only 9 in leprechaun years. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 15:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
::Hehe, my real secret is that I am only 9 in leprechaun years. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 15:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

:::100% right.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship&diff=277090172&oldid=277090038] I'm from Kathmandu. [[Special:Contributions/202.79.40.131|202.79.40.131]] ([[User talk:202.79.40.131|talk]]) 16:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:53, 14 March 2009

Archive
Talk page archives - Archive index

FP delist nom

A photo you (per this) nominated for FP is currently nominated for a delist and replace. Feel free to comment on the nom page. ~ ωαdεstεr16♣TC♣ 14:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tracking me down. Chillum 15:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Re: Recall of admin mbisanz. Thank you for your comment, I spoke with him and got nothing of substance. He echoed comments about it being not notable, but ignored constructive suggestions such as marking the work "under construction." I know it's not a numbers game, but if I recall correctly, most were in favor of keeping it and improving it. My belief is that the subject matter was his problem and that doesn't sit right with me.Brrryce (talk) 15:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with you disagreeing with mbisanz, it is you calling for his head on a platter for disagreeing with you that I find repugnant. Disagreement is essential for forming a neutral encyclopedia, it should not be punished, it is not "abuse". The productive deletion review that occurred was the correct venue, not seeking to remove a quality administrator from his post. Please assume good faith when you deal with people here, and do not imply a racial bias in other editors. Chillum 15:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account, a page you have edited, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- IRP 03:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, what a strange reason for deletion. Chillum 04:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Bradley

Discussion of Yvonne Bradley's deletion review is now taking place here---PJHaseldine (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For the comment you made on WT:RFA, hilarious! Giants27 T/C 15:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This one (for some reason I can put the link in the barnstar).--Giants27 T/C 15:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hehe, my real secret is that I am only 9 in leprechaun years. Chillum 15:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
100% right.[1] I'm from Kathmandu. 202.79.40.131 (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]