User talk:Bigen182: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:15, 14 March 2009

want virus?

okay

virus time.

July 2007

- Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Naren Khapung. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Precious Roy 19:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Naren Khapung, you will be blocked from editing. Precious Roy 19:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - -

File copyright problem with File:Traditional limbu.jpg

-

File Copyright problem

- Thank you for uploading File:Traditional limbu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

- - If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

- - If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sasikiran (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - -

File copyright problem with File:Paruhangma.jpg

-

File Copyright problem

- Thank you for uploading File:Paruhangma.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

- - If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

- - If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sasikiran (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - -

File copyright problem with File:VC limbu.jpg

-

File Copyright problem

- Thank you for uploading File:VC limbu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

- - If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

- - If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sasikiran (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Navjyoti school.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Navjyoti school.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

??wat

Speedy deletion of Walihang Tangnam

A tag has been placed on Walihang Tangnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sisekwa Tangnam

A tag has been placed on Sisekwa Tangnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Walihang Tangnam, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yakwa Tangnam

A tag has been placed on Yakwa Tangnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sisekwa Tangnam, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Learn how to be polite, an then we can talk. Copyrgiht violation is not accepted here. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kakphekwa Tangnam

A tag has been placed on Kakphekwa Tangnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be a dick.

I don't need to know anything about an article to judge wheter it is unreference or not, all I need to do is to take a quick look at it. Stop acting like you own Nepal-related articles, and take a look at WP:V, WP:OWN. And you better watch your words an tone, or I'll have to report you to administrators, for treating others with unpolitness. I'm really sorry for you, but you can't stop me from making Wikipedia better! =) Cheers, Victor Lopes (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article already looks bad, because its content is fully unreferenced. I'm just warning other people about that. This way, readers will be aware that they cannot fully trust what they are reading, and people with knowledge on the subject (like you) can provide sources. Do you need to know anything about Ringo Starr to know he's a male? Of course not, all you need to do is to take a look at a picture of him. The same applies here. I don't need to be an expert on this subject to see if the article is referenced or not. You have to keep in mind that Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and everything you write here is free for copying, editing and printing. If there's something wrong with a page, editors must at least adress the issue by placing those templates. Victor Lopes (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional Nepali Food

Very very very good photo.[1] :) 202.79.40.131 (talk) 17:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 I don't need to know ''anything'' about an article to judge wheter it is unreference or not, all I need to do is to take a quick look at it. Stop acting like you own Nepal-related articles, and take a look at [[WP:V]], [[WP:OWN]]. And you better watch your words an tone, or I'll have to report you to administrators, [[WP:CIVIL|for treating others with unpolitness]]. I'm really sorry for you, but you can't stop me from making Wikipedia better! =) Cheers, [[User:Victor Lopes|Victor Lopes]] ([[User talk:Victor Lopes|talk]]) 19:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 :The article already looks bad, because its content is fully unreferenced. I'm just warning other people about that. This way, readers will be aware that they cannot fully trust what they are reading, and people with knowledge on the subject (like you) can provide sources. Do you need to know ''anything'' about [[Ringo Starr]] to know he's a male? Of course not, all you need to do is to take a look at a picture of him. The same applies [[Dharan, Nepal|here]]. I don't need to be an expert on this subject to see if the article is referenced or not. You have to keep in mind that Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and everything you write here is free for copying, editing and printing. If there's something wrong with a page, editors ''must'' at least adress the issue by placing those templates. [[User:Victor Lopes|Victor Lopes]] ([[User talk:Victor Lopes|talk]]) 17:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
+== Traditional Nepali Food ==
+Very very very good photo.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Traditional_Nepali_Food.jpg] :) [[Special:Contributions/202.79.40.131|202.79.40.131]] ([[User talk:202.79.40.131|talk]]) 17:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)