Jump to content

User talk:Cutlerowns19: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: Line 31:


Whats the status?[[User:Cutlerowns19|Cutlerowns19]] ([[User talk:Cutlerowns19#top|talk]]) 03:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Whats the status?[[User:Cutlerowns19|Cutlerowns19]] ([[User talk:Cutlerowns19#top|talk]]) 03:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''

Revision as of 21:10, 24 March 2009

March 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Enigmamsg 04:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cutlerowns19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Vandalism is wrong and if unblocked i will become a fighter against vandalism. Please give me a second chance.

Decline reason:

Removing this as a duplicate; your request is still up for review with the template below, but looking at your contributions, I don't see why we should consider unblocking you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have drawn the attention of the blocking admin to your request. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it takes only secounds to get rewported for vandalsim but for un blcoking it takes days.............................. whyCutlerowns19 (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


MY FUTURE

Like i said earlier if i am unblocked i will take part in the adoption program. How do you know what i will do if you dont give me the chance. This Block has made me upset and i wont cause trouble again. Please review the request. I dont know what else to say IT WONT HAPPEN AGAIN. Cutlerowns19 (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking admin here

Why should we believe you? While you're answering that, I'll solicit some input from your favorite target. Toddst1 (talk)

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

Cutlerowns19 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Blocking administrator: blocking administrator (talk)

Reviewing administrator: slakrtalk / 02:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request reason:

I will participate in the adoption program so i can learn more about Wikipedia and contribute positive contributions.
Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=I will participate in the adoption program so i can learn more about Wikipedia and contribute positive contributions.|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=I will participate in the adoption program so i can learn more about Wikipedia and contribute positive contributions.|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}

I dont know why this is taking so long i just want to make positive contributions to wikipedia

Waiting for PMDrive to comment. We've got plenty of time. Toddst1 (talk) 23:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good and thanks for cleaning up the page. Im new to the formatting. Hopefully someone will adopt me.Cutlerowns19 (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While we're waiting, could you list the other accounts you've used on Wikipedia? Clearly the first edits with this account were not your first ones ever; you show far too much familiarity with Wikipedia for that. Mangojuicetalk 17:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other account i had was skier1924 and that's itCutlerowns19 (talk) 19:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the status?Cutlerowns19 (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment