Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Stratford: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Weak delete'''- per [[WP:N]]. If someone could find some better references, I'd be willing to look at this again. --[[User:Cameron Scott|Cameron Scott]] ([[User talk:Cameron Scott|talk]]) 01:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete'''- per [[WP:N]]. If someone could find some better references, I'd be willing to look at this again. --[[User:Cameron Scott|Cameron Scott]] ([[User talk:Cameron Scott|talk]]) 01:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:N]], [[WP:BIO]], [[WP:RS]], etc. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 14:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:N]], [[WP:BIO]], [[WP:RS]], etc. [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 14:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': Stratford is a major proponent of the idea that Gnosticism comes out of pre-christian pagan antiquity. [[Timothy Freke]] and [[Peter Gandy]] are proponents of the idea that Christianity is a pagan offshoot, and other authors have referenced an influence of Pagan antiquity on Gnosticism, but only Stratford draws a direct line between Paganism and Gnosticism, a controversial stance.
• [[WP:N]] may certainly be an issue, but [[WP:RS]] is quite clearly satisfied. It's only the sources themselves, ultimately, that are of use. [[User:Jordanstratford|Jordanstratford]] ([[User talk:Jordanstratford|talk]]) 14:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• [[WP:N]] may certainly be an issue, but [[WP:RS]] is quite clearly satisfied. It's only the sources themselves, ultimately, that are of use. [[User:Jordanstratford|Jordanstratford]] ([[User talk:Jordanstratford|talk]]) 14:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:08, 26 March 2009

Jordan Stratford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

general lack of notability, paucity or non-existence of legitimate resources Wikimonster007 (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:N may certainly be an issue, but WP:RS is quite clearly satisfied. It's only the sources themselves, ultimately, that are of use. Jordanstratford (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]